Re: FSDG status of chromium

On Tue 25 Sep 2018 21:36, Clément Lassieur writes: > Thank you very much for letting us know about these issues! I'm glad > Marius put it in a channel then, it was a wise decision. I hope we'll > make it free at some point, so that it can be integrated into Guix. But > there is Icecat 60 now (

Re: FSDG status of chromium

Andy Wingo writes: > On Tue 25 Sep 2018 21:36, Clément Lassieur writes: > >> Thank you very much for letting us know about these issues! I'm glad >> Marius put it in a channel then, it was a wise decision. I hope we'll >> make it free at some point, so that it can be integrated into Guix. But

Re: Blog: Guix packaging tutorial

Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Err... Actually I see that a few packages like "mg" uses %output and not > %outputs. What's the difference? ‘%outputs’ is the recommended way, ‘%output’ is not. :-) Ludo’.

Re: SeaGL 2018 Accepts Guix-Themed Talk: "Everyday Use of GNU Guix"

Hi Chris! Chris Marusich skribis: > I recently submitted a Guix-themed talk proposal for SeaGL 2018 [1], a > local GNU/Linux conference that takes place in November here in Seattle, > and I'm happy to report that it was accepted! Here's the link: > > "Everyday Use of GNU Guix" > https://osem.se

Re: ~/.guix-profile/manifest usage with "guix package -m [manifest]" / "guix pack -m [manifest]" etc..

Hello, YOANN P skribis: > I was thinking than "~/.guix-profile/manifest" was a valid manifest file due > to his name, but it seems not that is the case from the error i've got > > https://pastebin.com/Z7h2t5mL > > After some search , i've finally understand that the instantiated profile > coul

Re: Blog: Guix packaging tutorial

My understanding it that %output = (assoc-ref "out" %outputs) Is this correct? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Guix Outreachy project looking for co-mentor

Hello! Gábor Boskovits skribis: > we are looking for co-mentors to the 2018 December round of the Outreachy > project. > > We have one project proposal approved: > Create user video documentation for GNU Guix. Nice! I encourage people on this list to volunteer to co-mentor this project: increa

GNU Shepherd 0.5.0 released

We are pleased to announce the GNU Shepherd version 0.5.0, a release containing new features and bug fixes. • About The GNU Daemon Shepherd or GNU Shepherd is a service manager written in Guile that looks after the herd of system services. It provides a replacement for the service-managing

Re: GNU Shepherd 0.5.0 released

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > We are pleased to announce the GNU Shepherd version 0.5.0, a release > containing new features and bug fixes. kudos! > used as the init system of GuixSD, GNU’s advanced GNU/Linux distribution. I like the: GNU's advanced GNU/Lin

Re: SeaGL 2018 Accepts Guix-Themed Talk: "Everyday Use of GNU Guix"

Chris Marusich writes: > Hi Guix! > > I recently submitted a Guix-themed talk proposal for SeaGL 2018 [1], a > local GNU/Linux conference that takes place in November here in Seattle, > and I'm happy to report that it was accepted! Here's the link: > > "Everyday Use of GNU Guix" > https://osem.se

Re: Guix Outreachy project looking for co-mentor

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello! > > Gábor Boskovits skribis: > >> we are looking for co-mentors to the 2018 December round of the Outreachy >> project. >> >> We have one project proposal approved: >> Create user video documentation for GNU Guix. > > Nice! > > I encourage people on this list t

Re: FSDG status of chromium

On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:11:50 +0200 Andy wrote: > Are you aware of any concrete issue that has been raised look no further than the original 10 year old bug report that was never closed - that is enough "concrete" for my sensibilities - it plainly demonstrates that even the chromium developers are

Re: FSDG status of chromium

On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:23:51 +0200 Marius wrote: > Can you point out which part of the upstream bug that is relevant? > > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28291 the fact that it is still open after 10 years is relevance enough - IMHO i would want to see that bug closed as [F

GHC 8.4.3

Hi all, Some of you may recall that I started work on updating all of our Haskell packages to their LTS 12 versions, and making sure they all build with GHC 8.4.3. I think this work is ready to be included now (on a WIP branch, at least). The commits exist at