Joshua Branson transcribed 1.4K bytes:
> Nils Gillmann writes:
>
> > Joshua Branson transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> >> Amin Bandali writes:
> >>
> >> > Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> >> >
> >>
> >> There is also the Brave browser
> >>
> >> https://brave.com/
> >
> > It would very likely not be accepted
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 10:59:38AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> One of the most promising seems to be the SynQuacer:
>
> https://www.96boards.org/product/developerbox/
>
> With a 24-core processor, SATA, PCIe, USB 3.0, micro-atx form-factor,
> and 4 ram slots (up to 64GB, in theory, but ma
Alex Vong writes:
> Tags: patch
>
> Hello,
>
> The following patches update urls in 'gnu/packages/mp3.scm' to use
> https. For the package 'eyed3', I update it to use the redirected url.
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
Sorry, I meant to send the mail to guix-patch!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Tags: patch
Hello,
The following patches update urls in 'gnu/packages/mp3.scm' to use
https. For the package 'eyed3', I update it to use the redirected url.
Cheers,
Alex
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Is master FTBFS because of this update? I get the following error when
running make:
==
Updating ./doc/version.texi
MAKEINFO doc/guix.info
Updating ./doc/version-fr.texi
MAKEINFO doc/guix.fr.info
CXX nix/nix-daemon/gui
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:07:41AM +0800, Alex Vong wrote:
> Is master FTBFS because of this update? I get the following error when
> running make:
It works for me after I did `make clean` and made sure that guile-gcrypt
was available.
Basically:
$ guix environment --pure guix --ad-hoc guile-gcr
Hi Alex,
Alex Vong skribis:
> CXXLDguix-daemon
> /usr/bin/ld: nix/nix-daemon/guix_daemon-guix-daemon.o: in function `main':
> /home/alexvong1995/scm/guix/nix/nix-daemon/guix-daemon.cc:434: undefined
> reference to `gcry_check_version'
> /usr/bin/ld: /home/alexvong1995/scm/guix/nix/nix-dae
Hello Jan,
> The wip-bootstrap branch now builds without binutils, gcc, and glibc seeds.
>
> Thanks to #bootstrappable and #glibc and a week's work of hammering and
> determination we succeeded in bootstrapping glibc-2.16.0. This glibc is
> recent enough to bootstrap GuixSD!
> [...]
> We're now v
Hello!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Some of you know this already, but I think it’s time for a proper
> announcement here. I made a little something:
>
> https://issues.guix.info
One word: awesome!
Hopefully contributors-to-be will be less scared than with the old
interface, and… hopefully m
Hi,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> I admit that it's unclear whether or not those data transmissions could
> reasonably be called 'spyware', but at the very least their existence
> provides cover for spyware added later, by conditioning users to accept
> data transmission to Google when it hasn't been
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I’ve pushed to guix/maintenance.git a list of things that IMO we should
> do or might want to do for 1.0, with the understanding that 1.0 should
> happen in 2018 (or early 2019 at the latest!). :-)
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance
Kinda late to the party here but I think a goal for 1.0 should be to ensure
every single package builds on x86_64 and/or i686 and that most substitutes
are available at the time of release.
Having guix claim to have packages which then fail to build can leave a poor
first impression. It's fin
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 02:03:18PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 10:59:38AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> One of the most promising seems to be the SynQuacer:
>>
>> https://www.96boards.org/product/developerbox/
>>
>> With a 24-core processor, SATA, PCIe, USB 3.0, mic
>> Is this about allowing attached patches to be downloaded? Is it
>> currently possible to download patches using mumi? It would be nice to
>> use mumi for my entire workflow, and not have to fallback to the old
>> debbugs web interface.
>
> This is now possible. I currently only decode attachm
14 matches
Mail list logo
