Chris Marusich writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Garbage collection in the context of Guix is not very difficult to
>> understand. The garbage collector may remove any item that has zero
>> users; the link count on a store item is indicative of the number of
>> users that item has. For ga
2018-02-20 9:37 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits :
> 2018-02-18 14:22 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus :
>
>>
>> Hi Gábor,
>>
>> > On february the 20. at 18:00 local time I will give a talk about Guix
>> and
>> > GuixSD for the Hungarian FSF community.
>>
>> That’s great!
>>
>> > I based the style of my talk on
Hi Alex,
>> The reference scanner is already implemented in the form of grafts. The
>> code opens each file and searches efficiently for store references.
>>
> Does this mean we have procedure to do a single find-reference and the
> remaining work is to build a recursive find-reference?
The cur
I don't know what caused this, but something between Guix
0.14.0-6.0dcf675 and 0.14.0-8.bc880f9 forced my own computer attempt to
build Emacs, and resulted in a working Emacs version.
Store path name differences for Emacs:
- Old (working): b1nbgnpifkisz4szmasxrwzqlgqagy8w-emacs-25.3
- New (self-b
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:49:19AM -0500, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> nckx pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 79f0561f43cc62dd332007cd847c0ad2870b3afc
> Author: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
> Date: Wed Feb 21 06:06:46 2018 +0100
>
> gnu: htop: Fix tree view.
>
Leo,
On 2018-02-21 17:59, Leo Famulari wrote:
Thanks for taking care of this! Can you make sure to report the problem
upstream?
+From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
+I will investigate further...
;-)
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent from a Web browser. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:54:36AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > There are some patches on the staging branch, including an update to the
> > time zone database.
> >
> > What are the plans for the next week or so? Should we try merging the
> > staging branch in that time
Hi,
thanks for raising the PYTHONPATH issue. Looks like we have a major
problem here.
Am 20.02.2018 um 11:53 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> I don’t know why this happens. I find it puzzling that in this
> particular case the user’s profile contains an *older* version of
> statsmodels (0.6.1). The wr
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Here’s a patch to graft the glibc to apply the patch to allow the 2.6.32
>> kernel. I’m going to apply this at work now.
>
> That patch had a couple of problems. Here’s a new version.
[...]
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm
