On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:45:58AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> Java currently only affects x86_64, so I'm not sure that it would need
> to be staging specifically. In any case if we can get it merged within
> the next week or so that'd be amazing. I know our cmake is in need of an
> upgrade, ma
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:57:06AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:45:58AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > Java currently only affects x86_64, so I'm not sure that it would need
> > to be staging specifically. In any case if we can get it merged within
> > the next week or
>> I know our cmake is in need of an upgrade
I submitted a patchset for updating cmake a couple of weeks ago.
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30390
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 01:07:11PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:57:06AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:45:58AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > > Java currently only affects x86_64, so I'm not sure that it would need
> > > to be staging specifi
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:14:39PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> CMake is just old, not especially in need of updates. It would be nice
> to ungraft stuff though.
I just meant to not switch cmake versions together with other things:
$ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l cmake
Building the following
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 02:17:59PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:14:39PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > CMake is just old, not especially in need of updates. It would be nice
> > to ungraft stuff though.
>
> I just meant to not switch cmake versions together with other
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:53:54AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Would it be good to make the wrappers for Python scripts stricter and
> not accept any user-set PYTHONPATH?
I think that is a bad idea. You need to be able to opt out. Also
people need to experiment with modules without understandin
On Tue 20 Feb 2018 16:01, Pjotr Prins writes:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:53:54AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Would it be good to make the wrappers for Python scripts stricter and
>> not accept any user-set PYTHONPATH?
>
> I think that is a bad idea. You need to be able to opt out.
Why? I
Hi Pjotr,
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:53:54AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Would it be good to make the wrappers for Python scripts stricter and
>> not accept any user-set PYTHONPATH?
>
> I think that is a bad idea. You need to be able to opt out. Also
> people need to experiment with modules
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:18:40PM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> In Guix we don't set LD_LIBRARY_PATH but we do set PYTHONPATH, so it's
> not quite the same I don't think.
Not exactly the same, but close enough ;). But it is clearer now that
mixing is the problem. Ricardos .pth may be an option if th
Leo Famulari writes:
> lfam pushed a commit to branch staging
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 62868f124cf9443a43f4ea5867da692e32e77c58
> Author: Leo Famulari
> Date: Mon Feb 19 23:47:46 2018 -0500
>
> gnu: tzdata: Preserve directory layout from before tzdata 2018a.
>
> tzdata 201
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:17:34PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > lfam pushed a commit to branch staging
> > in repository guix.
> >
> > commit 62868f124cf9443a43f4ea5867da692e32e77c58
> > Author: Leo Famulari
> > Date: Mon Feb 19 23:47:46 2018 -0500
> >
> > gnu: t
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Garbage collection in the context of Guix is not very difficult to
> understand. The garbage collector may remove any item that has zero
> users; the link count on a store item is indicative of the number of
> users that item has. For garbage collection you essentially
rennes writes:
> Is it necessary to have the services started correctly to run 'guix
> system init ..' ?
No, I don't think it's necessary. Judging by the source code, it looks
like "guix system init" does not start any services. The relevant bits
are in the "install" procedure in guix/script
2018-02-18 14:22 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus :
>
> Hi Gábor,
>
> > On february the 20. at 18:00 local time I will give a talk about Guix and
> > GuixSD for the Hungarian FSF community.
>
> That’s great!
>
> > I based the style of my talk on one given by Ludo. I Left the copyright
> > notices intact,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 07:46:02PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I have a bad day. After the upgrade to glibc 2.26 none of the
> Guix-installed software runs on the HPC cluster running CentOS 6.8.
>
> The glibc 2.26 expects a minimum kernel version of 3.x on x86_64, but
> CentOS 6.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:54:36AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > There are some patches on the staging branch, including an update to the
> > time zone database.
> >
> > What are the plans for the next week or so? Should we try merging the
> > staging branch in that time
Hi Guix,
we have a couple of packages that provide scripts that depend on Python
modules. We wrap them in PYTHONPATH to ensure that the correct Python
modules are found at runtime.
This is not enough.
We don’t wrap them tightly enough; instead we allow for a user-provided
PYTHONPATH value to be
18 matches
Mail list logo
