Re: GSoC

On Tue, 06 Feb 2018, n...@n0.is wrote: > On second thoughts I think it's okay to have all of this in > public, there are no stupid questions. > > On Mon, 05 Feb 2018, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: >> Heya, >> >> n...@n0.is skribis: >> >>> Sorry for the offlist message, but I thought since y

Re: GSoC

2018-02-08 12:25 GMT+01:00 : > On Tue, 06 Feb 2018, n...@n0.is wrote: > > On second thoughts I think it's okay to have all of this in > > public, there are no stupid questions. > > > > On Mon, 05 Feb 2018, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> Heya, > >> > >> n...@n0.is skribis: > >> > >>> So

Re: GSoC

On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, Gábor Boskovits wrote: > 2018-02-08 12:25 GMT+01:00 : > >> On Tue, 06 Feb 2018, n...@n0.is wrote: >> > On second thoughts I think it's okay to have all of this in >> > public, there are no stupid questions. >> > >> > On Mon, 05 Feb 2018, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: >

Re: GSoC

On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, n...@crash.cx wrote: > On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, Gábor Boskovits wrote: >> 2018-02-08 12:25 GMT+01:00 : >> >>> On Tue, 06 Feb 2018, n...@n0.is wrote: >>> > On second thoughts I think it's okay to have all of this in >>> > public, there are no stupid questions. >>> > >>> > On Mon, 0

Re: Cuirass news

Heya Danny, Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > If possible, let's put guile-sqlite3 stuff there - otherwise there will be > xtra records around (I've pushed those to my fork already). > > Corresponding changes for guix-cuirass, starting from > commit 4558d1c86914e2427fc99afbe00c28cb716dbd3d: Follo

Re: UEFI testing

Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > at FOSDEM we've been talking about testing UEFI booting in Guix system tests. Speaking of which, there was a talk on the topic of QEMU/UEFI: https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/vai_qemu_in_uefi/ Ludo’.

Re: Call for project proposals: Guix and Outreachy

Hello, Ricardo Wurmus skribis: >> 3. rewrite more things currently provided by bootstrap binaries in >> guile to reduce our bootsrap binary base. > > This seems good, as it consists of many independent sub-projects. On > the other hand: we already have a couple of implementations that are > jus

Re: Call for project proposals: Guix and Outreachy

Andreas Enge skribis: > quite a list of interesting ideas! > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:51:10AM +0100, Gábor Boskovits wrote: >> 10. provide user interface to our build farm where we could request building >> a >> specific package. > > This is one specific feature, but could be framed into a m

RISC-V port for GSoC?

Hello ng0, n...@n0.is skribis: > On second thoughts I think it's okay to have all of this in > public, there are no stupid questions. In general it’s not OK to quote private messages on a public list without the author’s consent. No big deal in this case, but please keep that in mind in the fut

Re: RISC-V port for GSoC?

On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Hello ng0, > > n...@n0.is skribis: > >> On second thoughts I think it's okay to have all of this in >> public, there are no stupid questions. > > In general it’s not OK to quote private messages on a public list > without the author’s con

Re: Call for project proposals: Guix and Outreachy

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Andreas Enge skribis: > >> quite a list of interesting ideas! >> >> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:51:10AM +0100, Gábor Boskovits wrote: >>> 10. provide user interface to our build farm where we could request >>> building a >>> specific package. >> >> This is one specific

Re: Cuirass news

Hi Ludo, On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:37:58 +0100 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > We’re making progress! :-) Nice! I'm still checking a few loose ends but I think we're pretty okay now from a security standpoint - except for db-get-builds, which I'm amending right now. Also, I'd like to get

ARM compilation via qemu binfmt - Assertion failure

Hi ng0, On Tue, 06 Feb 2018 10:33:56 + n...@n0.is wrote: > recently I've read about slow but native compiling of ARM on qemu. Unfortunately, there's a (pretty reproducible) problem with it. guix-master/guix $ ./pre-inst-env guix system disk-image --system=armhf-linux -e "(@ (gnu system ins

Re: Haunt patches

Hello, (Ccing guix-devel@gnu.org.) I wrote patches that introduce page variants for translations. I will send them right after this mail. If there are interested guix-devel readers, they can find them at https://pelzflorian.de/git/haunt/commit/?id=ac3e93fe35363fd0066cf93b969c95c0fde7a25a https

Re: RISC-V port for GSoC?

Ludovic Courtès writes: > To give some context, the issue is about the RISC-V port item at > . > > I’m happy to help with Guix porting insight, but apart from that I’m not > the most qualified person and I’d rather have someone else mentor it, i

Re: Should I enable lua-scripting in the neomutt package?

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:52:33 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > ng0 writes: > > Should we just wait until neomutt enables lua-scripting by default in > > the build? > > I’d say: yes. +1

Re: RISC-V port for GSoC?

2018-02-08 19:42 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus : > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > > To give some context, the issue is about the RISC-V port item at > > . > > > > I’m happy to help with Guix porting insight, but apart from that I’m not > > the most qua

Re: Call for project proposals: Guix and Outreachy

2018-02-08 17:23 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus : > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > > Andreas Enge skribis: > > > >> quite a list of interesting ideas! > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:51:10AM +0100, Gábor Boskovits wrote: > >>> 10. provide user interface to our build farm where we could request > b

Re: RISC-V port for GSoC?

On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> To give some context, the issue is about the RISC-V port item at >> . >> >> I’m happy to help with Guix porting insight, but apart from that I’m not >> the most qualified p

Re: Call for project proposals: Guix and Outreachy

Gábor Boskovits writes: >> The project idea sounds good, but we really need a mentor who feels >> responsible for this project and who will be able to guide an intern >> throughout the application phase and the three-month internship between >> from May to August. […] > If we could draft the sp

Re: Cuirass news

Hi Danny, Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 14:37:58 +0100 > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: >> We’re making progress! :-) > > Nice! I'm still checking a few loose ends but I think we're pretty okay now > from a security standpoint - except for db-get-builds, which I'm a

Re: RISC-V port for GSoC?

ng0 skribis: > On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: [...] >> My opinion is to remove it from the list of GSoC ideas. > > Okay, sounds more than reasonable. I also vote for removal. > > So we have 4 people agreeing on removal.. let's take it down then. Agreed, thanks. Ludo’.

Re: Cuirass news

Hi Ludo, On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 23:21:58 +0100 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > > from a security standpoint - except for db-get-builds, which I'm amending > > right now. > > Oh sorry, I think I did the same thing as you were sending this message: > > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgi

Re: Cuirass news

2018-02-09 0:05 GMT+01:00 Danny Milosavljevic : > Hi Ludo, > > On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 23:21:58 +0100 > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > > > > from a security standpoint - except for db-get-builds, which I'm > amending > > > right now. > > > > Oh sorry, I think I did the same thing as you were