Hi
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:53:37PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>> A second step might be a simplified Guile build system, which does not
>> rely on autotools infrastructure. I believe this was discussed in the
>> past: it would be a "begi
Hi Ricardo,
This is a great start - I'm excited to playing with a prototype!
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> As a first implementation of channels I’d just like to have a channel
> description file that records at least the following things:
>
> * the channel name (all lower case, no spaces)
> * a URL
>
> What do you mean by disable? You could invoke it at any time with a
> clean Bash session. Also I would recommend to search for a Fedora's
> Bash feature for installing programms if a command is missing and
> disable/remove it. Fedora's folks probably could help this it.
>
> Oleg.
Thanks fo
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Here are two patches that:
>
> * Add gcc-7.3.0-RC-20180117, which includes support for retpoline.
> * Use gcc-7.3 to build linux-libre on x86 systems.
With GCC 7.3.0 now out, I think you can go ahead.
> From 387a02c3f9e157bdf40b2b5ad0e53e5b209f3aa5 Mon Sep 17
Hi Danny,
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> I saw that (cuirass database) has some problems with sql injection.
> I defused it a little, see attached patch.
Yes, I was unhappy with that, glad you fixed it. :-)
> While we are at it, we can also reuse prepared statements (using the
> sqltext as ke
Hello!
Jelle Licht skribis:
> I noticed that there are currently two very similar functions for fetching
> json data; `json-fetch' in (guix import json) and `json-fetch*' in (guix
> import github).
>
> Some things I noticed:
> - Dealing with http error codes seems to be a bit more robust in
> `j
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> FYI, in another thread, I recently posted preliminary patches to add the
>>> GCC 7.3 release candidate as a Guix package, and to use it to build
>>> linux-libre on x86_64 and i686 systems:
>>>
>>>
Hello,
myg...@gmail.com skribis:
> Before you build these two sites, how about considering a more unified
> approach? IMO this will be easier for users to understand and require
> less work. Using 'GuixE' to refer to everything in '(guix) Top' you
> could say:
I think changing names to address a
On Mon, Dec 18 2017, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Sat 16 Dec 2017 08:55, Chris Marusich writes:
>
>> * Place point on symbol expression->derivation-in-linux-vm on line 203
>> (in the definition of the iso9660-image procedure), and press "C-c <".
>>
>> When I do this, I receive the following message i
Hi Ludo,
> Yes, I was unhappy with that, glad you fixed it. :-)
I've now forked guile-sqlite3 and put the stuff that makes sense for a
low-level binding there (not sqlite-exec - that would still be in guix-cuirass).
These are:
- stmts hash-table is now in guile-sqlite3's .
- sqlite-finalize ada
... and a fix to an example:
Note: I'm incapable of making the pass-through of the fetch-repository result
through
(call-with-output-fdes 1 "/dev/null"
(lambda () (fetch-repository spec))
work, thus disabled it.
diff --git a/examples/guix-track-git.scm b/examples/guix-track-git.scm
index
On 01/27/2018 at 17:14 Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello,
>
> myg...@gmail.com skribis:
>
>> Before you build these two sites, how about considering a more unified
>> approach? IMO this will be easier for users to understand and require
>> less work. Using 'GuixE' to refer to everything in '(guix) T
> I've now forked guile-sqlite3 and put the stuff that makes sense for a
> low-level binding there (not sqlite-exec - that would still be in
> guix-cuirass).
I've created a pull request https://notabug.org/civodul/guile-sqlite3/pulls/2
now.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> Here are two patches that:
>>
>> * Add gcc-7.3.0-RC-20180117, which includes support for retpoline.
>> * Use gcc-7.3 to build linux-libre on x86 systems.
>
> With GCC 7.3.0 now out, I think you can go ahead.
>
>> From 387a02c3f9
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 01:20:29PM -0500, myg...@gmail.com wrote:
> PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:
>
> The Guix software environment manager creates user environments that
> are completely and independently specified by users. Guix users are
> never are stuck needing software that a Sysadmin can't, won't, o
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> Chris Marusich skribis:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
>>> Hi Guix,
>>>
>>> on the website it starts right away with a list of features:
>>> “Liberating”, “Dependable”, and “Hackable”. But what is this thing
>>> called Guix?
>>>
>>> We should
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> myg...@gmail.com skribis:
>
>> Before you build these two sites, how about considering a more unified
>> approach? IMO this will be easier for users to understand and require
>> less work. Using 'GuixE' to refer to everything in '(guix) Top' you
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> In December, Richard Henwood of ARM Holdings kindly donated two SoftIron
> OverDrive 1000:
>
> https://softiron.com/development-tools/overdrive-1000/
>
> These are 4-core, pretty fast machines. Both are currently at my place
> and I recen
Fis Trivial writes:
> I think I will have to disable guix for a while since it's really messing
> up with my environment and I currently don't have the time to deal with
> it. :(
> I will come back latter and try joining the development for guix itself,
> really sorry.
I hope you come back soon!
19 matches
Mail list logo
