Mark H Weaver writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Marius Bakke writes:
>>
>>> Note that mesa and libdrm did not build any drivers at all on armhf
>>> until recent commits on 'staging'. I tried cross-compiling libdrm
>>> to update etnaviv symbols instead, but failed some packages before it.
>>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 08:38:13PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Do you think it should be acceptable to merge a major branch into
> 'master' where *all* graphical packages are broken on armhf?
I think we all agree that we should not do this.
As somebody who also works on merging these branches,
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.0K bytes:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I understand and sympathize with your arguments. In fact, this has been
> a long running theme, and we discussed it at last year’s FOSDEM at
> length. :-)
>
> Thomas Danckaert skribis:
>
> > So I do see the appeal of something like gitl
