In the linked resource, you have "(lambda () ...)" on like 36 as a phase. That
probably doesn't work since Guix passes quite a few arguments there (where the
inputs are, where the outputs are, compilation flags etcetc). If you don't
care about them, just use a variable name to hold them all (f
Hi Ludovic,
Something is wrong here: the “*boot0” packages are not
cross-compilable,
they should never show up here.
What branch are you on? On master on GNU/Linux I don’t see them on
the
list of things to build:
I'm working on core-updates branch on GNU/Linux, I've updated my
reposit
Just reproduced it as well. I would like to add that the problem existed
on all cross-compilation targets, not only Hurd.
Cross-compilation on core-updates works now.
Manolis
On 07/02/17 15:32, rennes wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
>> Something is wrong here: the “*boot0” packages are not cross-compila
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:37:58PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> Currently Aarch64 support in guix is pretty good, as long as you don't
> mind compiling for yourself :). Potential downfalls are too little RAM
> (I limited my boards to 2GB minimum) and using an SD card. For building
> packages I m
The appended two patches fail, for a reason which is not apparent
to me (and no reason I could capture).
This is mostly based on the font-build-system with some additions,
it's more or less the same except for the unpack and install phases.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
G
Thank you. That also explains the error messages I got; for some reason I
thought '_' was special, but of course - this is lisp, it's not weird like
that.
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 11:18:47 +0200
Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> In the linked resource, you have "(lambda () ...)" on like 36 as a phase.
> T
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 04:19:26PM +, ng0 wrote:
> The appended two patches fail, for a reason which is not apparent
> to me (and no reason I could capture).
>
> This is mostly based on the font-build-system with some additions,
> it's more or less the same except for the unpack and install ph
Efraim Flashner transcribed 18K bytes:
> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 04:19:26PM +, ng0 wrote:
> > The appended two patches fail, for a reason which is not apparent
> > to me (and no reason I could capture).
> >
> > This is mostly based on the font-build-system with some additions,
> > it's more or
I found the mistake, a simple typo. Updated patch coming soon.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ng0 transcribed 1.3K bytes:
> I found the mistake, a simple typo. Updated patch coming soon.
That would've been too easy, but there was a typo.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
From 1596e
Thomas Danckaert skribis:
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Subject: Deleting system generations
> Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 15:15:23 +0200
>
>> Thomas: I think you (was it you?) started working on a ‘guix system
>> delete-generations’ sub-command so make it more accessible. Any
>> update?
>
ng0 transcribed 10K bytes:
> What happened to this idea?
>
> Is anyone working on it or should I try to find someone who
> wants to work on it?
>
> It's rather simple from my perspective.
Alright. Going by the example I provided earlier this
year, could we simply use a variable in there which
ge
Alex Vong (2017-06-29 12:28 +0800) wrote:
> "Feng Shu" writes:
>
>> Now I have found that 'guix pull' is too slow,
>> I need 3 hours to compile guix, is it possible to speed it ?
>
> Maybe you can try building from git instead? I used to run
> '$ guix pull && guix package --upgrade', but it gets
Hi,
> >- Currently, the installer invokes the parted executable for
> >partitioning which is quite jarring (it looks very different). It
> >would be nice if it just used the parted library. But there's no
> >good guile-parted yet. I've started hacking on one and it's
> >starting to look OK
14 matches
Mail list logo
