Re: need help with debugging gopherd (geomyidae) service

ng0 writes: > When I start this via the arguments I pass (well, any arguments), > without the service it starts and I can access the server. > > The service never starts (and due to its simplistic nature, no > "BOOM CRASH THIS IS WHY I REFUSE TO START" is seen. > In this version I added 'networki

WIP pgmodeler

I have this patch for pgmodeler https://www.pgmodeler.com.br/ It builds. I would say that 20% of the work is done, now the remaining 80% is integration work It has some somewhat bizarre runtime requirements and procedures, it probably needs some search paths to be set and probably a desktop fil

Register for the GNU Hackers Meeting, August 25–27!

Hello Guix! Now’s the time to register for the GNU Hackers Meeting: https://www.gnu.org/ghm/ https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/ghm-discuss/2017-05/msg0.html A bunch of Guix hackers (myself included) are planning to be there, so let’s take advantage of this event to meet in person, chat

Re: Performance of the man page database generation

Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > 18 man subdirectories contained newer manual pages. > 3943 manual pages were added. > find-files: > /gnu/store/5mk4lg1rdzq2p3148idjd4z0bvif0nf4-gimp-2.8.18/share/man/man1/gimp-console.1: > No such file or directory > guix build: error: build failed: derivat

Re: We need a different downloader for KDE

Hello, Hartmut Goebel skribis: > can anybody more skilled than me please implement some HTTP(s) updater, > so we can "refresh" directly from downloads.kde.org. Please apologize, > if there already is one, I did not spot one. > > Yesterday KDE released an security update, which was available at >

Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image

Hi Danny, Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > On Fri, 12 May 2017 17:33:21 +0200 > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: >> Then users should pick the right one, usually the macro, and get an >> error when they pass an invalid UUID. > > Note that the directory /dev/disk/by-uuid doesn't contain any ma

shepherd -> guile 2.2?

Hi Guix, I have built shepherd with guile-2.2, but I noticed a couple of warnings/errors during the build: --8<---cut here---start->8--- starting phase `build' /gnu/store/6908gy3pws0ccys49ni98idwnicchlr2-coreutils-8.26/bin/mkdir -p "`dirname modules/shepherd/c

Customizing /etc

This is almost the same message as: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg01570.html I mean this is a reminder on the subject. Ludovic, I think you suggested a good solution to a "Customizing /etc/profile" problem. Since I will no longer be a blocker of

Re: shepherd -> guile 2.2?

On Tue 16 May 2017 10:42, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > ;;; WARNING: compilation of > /gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild failed: > ;;; ERROR: failed to create path for auto-compiled file > "/gnu/store/5zx29y44nrqj0s8h3jlvlj82k8hj4dxs-guile-2.2.2/bin/guild" This is bec

How do I fix a messed-up Guix?

Hi everyone, since ¨guix pull" failed (see a recent message), I tried various ideas for getting back to a useable guix installation: - Build from a git checkout. Unfortunately, I cannot do "guix environment guix" anymore (like "guix pull", it tries to download python-2.7.12 and fails due to

Re: How do I fix a messed-up Guix?

On 16/05/2017 15:02, Konrad Hinsen wrote: I ended up rolling back until my profile no longer contained "guix" (I have no idea how I could ever produce such a profile), so now I am completely stuck. Any idea for getting out of this mess? I forgot two details: - I tried building python-2.7.12

Re: bug#26346: [PATCH] asdf-build-system improvements.

Hi Andy, > As promised a long time ago, I'm attaching patches to improve the state > of the asdf-build-system. I will push your patches with some very minor changes (e.g. fixed typos, slightly adjusted commit summaries) after confirming that stumpwm still works fine. Thank you for your patches

Re: 150 € at Knüllwald venue

dude the math checks out

Re: How do I fix a messed-up Guix?

Le 2017-05-16 15:11, Konrad Hinsen a écrit : On 16/05/2017 15:02, Konrad Hinsen wrote: I ended up rolling back until my profile no longer contained "guix" (I have no idea how I could ever produce such a profile), so now I am completely stuck. Any idea for getting out of this mess? I forgot tw

Re: How do I fix a messed-up Guix?

If you still have guix in the store you can use the store path to reach and run it. As I had something similar today that there was no recent guix... I actually restored with a slightly older 'guix pack' from a different machine. https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/news/creating-bundles-with-guix

Re: How do I fix a messed-up Guix?

Hi Julien, You could probably use the other user's guix version. Copy ~otheruser/.config/guix/latest to your own user's .config/guix, and try to guix pull from that. That won't mess with the other user's profile. Thanks, that helped, though not directly: the other user didn't have ~/.config/g

Re: Planning for the next release

On 15/05/17 07:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Leo! > > (sirgazil: this is about providing a ready-to-use VM image of GuixSD for > download, in addition to the installation image. See at the bottom.) [...] > sirgazil: do you think we should add a special icon or something for the > VM image? Ye

Re: Rethinking guix pull [was Re: Heads-up: transition to Guile 2.2]

myglc2 writes: > I believe there will be many guix "users" that want to run from git > checkout. They just may not know it, yet. They will want it not just > because they are trying to get around the limitations of git pull. For > example, even users that don't do development have occasion to..

GNU Hackers Meeting, August 25–27 near Kassel in Hesse, Germany ("Knüllwald")

"Knüllwald" sounds like a truely epic venue ;-)

Re: Planning for the next release

If it's not too late for the release, I think it would be good to make guile-json an optional dependency (currently it is required). A simple fix is here: http://debbugs.gnu.org/26860 Although Ricardo suggested another solution there. -- Alex

Re: Performance of the man page database generation

Hi Ludovic, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi Maxim, > > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> 18 man subdirectories contained newer manual pages. >> 3943 manual pages were added. >> find-files: >> /gnu/store/5mk4lg1rdzq2p3148idjd4z0bvif0nf4-gimp-2.8.18/share/man/man1/gimp-console.1: >> No s

Re: Planning for the next release

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:41:38AM -0500, sirgazil wrote: > On 15/05/17 07:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi Leo! > > > > (sirgazil: this is about providing a ready-to-use VM image of GuixSD for > > download, in addition to the installation image. See at the bottom.) > > [...] > > > sirgazil: do

Re: Planning for the next release

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:41:38AM -0500, sirgazil wrote: > On 15/05/17 07:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi Leo! > > > > (sirgazil: this is about providing a ready-to-use VM image of GuixSD for > > download, in addition to the installation image. See at the bottom.) > > [...] > > > sirgazil: do

Re: shepherd -> guile 2.2?

I run shepherd in debian with guile 2.2.2 it cannot find my apache2, though

Re: guix pull timing out on low resource servers

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:12:01AM +, ng0 wrote: > Since the switch to Guile 2.2 and guix pull taking much more > computing time and resources, all my virtual hosting servers > time out when I run guix pull on them without using mosh > and just openssh, because the process just takes much too >

Re: Rethinking guix pull [was Re: Heads-up: transition to Guile 2.2]

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > myglc2 writes: > >> I believe there will be many guix "users" that want to run from git >> checkout. They just may not know it, yet. They will want it not just >> because they are trying to get around the limitations of git pull. For >>

Re: Planning for the next release

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 02:44:51PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] doc: Mention the pre-built VM image. > > * doc/guix.texi (Running GuixSD in a VM): Mention the pre-built VM image. > > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] maint: The 'release' target builds a VM im

Re: Planning for the next release

On 16/05/17 13:19, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 09:41:38AM -0500, sirgazil wrote: >> On 15/05/17 07:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>> Hi Leo! >>> >>> (sirgazil: this is about providing a ready-to-use VM image of GuixSD for >>> download, in addition to the installation image. See at

Re: Planning for the next release

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 07:51:36PM -0500, sirgazil wrote: > On 16/05/17 13:19, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Although, I am wondering why 'installer.svg' seems specific to the VM > > image now. The VM image is not an installer. > Hi Leo :) > > I don't know if I understand correctly, but the "installed.s