>From de9f486828827b1d024cad4918eed3ed96202cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:30:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] import: Update Bioconductor release to 3.5.
* guix/import/cran.scm: Change Bioconductor release to 3.5.
---
guix/import/cran.scm | 4 ++--
1 file chan
From: Chris Marusich
Subject: Re: JARs and reference scanning
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:34:02 -0700
I have to admit that I do not know at all how the reference
scanning and
dependency-tracking in the store works.
As I understand it, the mechanism used by the Guix daemon (and the
Nix
daemon
Hi Efraim,
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:22:43 +0300
Efraim Flashner wrote:
> The collection of inputs makes me wonder if it should be glib-or-gtk
> build-system and not "just" gnu-build-system. I don't have a good way to
> test if its necessary, but I'd look around.
Here's an updated patch using glib
I forgot to wrap "org.freedesktop.Notifications" in the description in
@code{..}, as suggested by Marius. Here it is with this as well.
From 922cbeb402ece8dbd0d592489069d7ccda64d702 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petter
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:33:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add Xfce Notifi
Petter writes:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 22:22:43 +0300
> Efraim Flashner wrote:
>
>> The collection of inputs makes me wonder if it should be glib-or-gtk
>> build-system and not "just" gnu-build-system. I don't have a good way to
>> test if its necessary, but I'd look around.
>
> Her
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:39:19 +0200
Marius Bakke wrote:
>
> Takk! Pushed as b63106089a1eb2ac76303886f926f74967879386.
>
> By the way, patches should now be sent to the new "guix-patc...@gnu.org"
> issue tracker. :-)
Supert! :)
Yes, I realized this a couple of days ago. I'll write an e-mail disc
Hi Guix,
I quite recently realized I sent a couple of patches to guix-devel, whereas
they should now go to guix-patches. I use the online manual and the current
state is that there's a couple of references to guix-devel for submitting
patches.
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Su
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:36:27 -0500
Eric Bavier wrote:
> Could you ping the developer about porting some of these fixes to their
> fork? I think we'd want to create a local patch for at least the first
> commit. The others could wait for a new release.
Sure, I'll do that!
> > +(inputs
> >
On April 26, 2017 4:53:33 AM PDT, Thomas Danckaert
wrote:
[...]
>The code scanning for reference is in nix/libstore/references.cc .
>It looks for base32 hashes encoded as character strings in the
>binaries.
>
>Could/should this be generalized somehow? Apart from compression,
>store filenames
Hi Petter!
I think all of the different mailing lists used by Guix and their intended use
should be mentioned and or corrected in the manual (sending patches , reporting
bugs, discussing ideas or requesting help, etc.)
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:33:13PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I just merged master into staging and started a new evaluation. Barring
> any new complications, I plan to merge staging into master later today.
I merged the staging branch into the master branch as
2018eea07bb00663d2f0cec9d9085d51af
Thank you Jan for sharing these precious notes!
I've saved your message; I had started looking into Hurd last year, but
then turned my attention to Guix and have been (slowly) making myself at home
here. I
intend to restart investigating Hurd as things stabilize on the Guix
side :). They are dest
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:33:13PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> I just merged master into staging and started a new evaluation. Barring
>> any new complications, I plan to merge staging into master later today.
>
> I merged the staging branch into the master branch as
> 2
Roel Janssen writes:
> From de9f486828827b1d024cad4918eed3ed96202cc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:30:52 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] import: Update Bioconductor release to 3.5.
>
> * guix/import/cran.scm: Change Bioconductor release to 3.5.
> guix/impor
14 matches
Mail list logo
