Alex Kost (2017-04-11 23:04 +0300) wrote:
> Chris Marusich (2017-04-11 00:40 -0700) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost writes:
>>
>>> Note, however, that in most cases (not in this case) using "require" is
>>> not needed at all! Usually it is enough to have the generated
>>> autoloads. For example, if you i
To make it clear, this is a question about Emacs-Guix.
Feng Shu (2017-04-12 07:10 +0800) wrote:
> Maybe we should add three addition keybinding:
>
> 1. Force rebuild the package defined by the current variable definition.
What do you mean? What is the analogous guix shell command?
> 2. Install
l...@famulari.name (Leo Famulari) writes:
> lfam pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 69121e95cd5568238a0f207dfab708501ec4a753
> Author: Leo Famulari
> Date: Tue Apr 11 13:09:03 2017 -0400
>
> gnu: libressl: Update to 2.5.3.
>
> * gnu/packages/tls.scm (
Hello Hartmut,
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Hartmut Goebel
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just discovered that libxml2 sets the search-path-specification for
> variable "XML_CATALOG_FILES" using space as separator, which is very
> uncommon. The documentation for libxml2 does not state which separator
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 05:15:32AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> l...@famulari.name (Leo Famulari) writes:
> > gnu: libressl: Update to 2.5.3.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (libressl): Update to 2.5.3.
>
> This failed to build on Hydra on both x86_64 and i686 (the only builds
> that
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:07:30PM +0200, Stefan Reichör wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried today to install Guix v12.0 on an OpenVZ hoster:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Binary-Installation.html#Binary-Installation
>
> But I failed with the following problem:
>
> ~/bin% ./guix
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:44:12AM +, ng0 wrote:
> There's also an OpenSSL-1.1.0 related bug which was fixed since the
> release of fossil 2.1, reported by Debian:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847556#10
We are still building packages with OpenSSL-1.0.2, so we can ignore
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:32:31AM +, ng0 wrote:
> ng0 transcribed 4.7K bytes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > my editor wraps at 80 lines but I hope the errors are obvious for
> > someone who did fix fossil before (Efraim?).
> > Could it be that not all tests have been updated for the new format?
>
> Lookin
On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 02:21:50PM +, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari transcribed 1.4K bytes:
> > On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 09:08:45AM +, ng0 wrote:
> > > What you added here is opensshd listening on port with
> > > password-logins allowed, correct?
> >
> > Yes, and the rest of the defaults c
Leo Famulari transcribed 0.8K bytes:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:32:31AM +, ng0 wrote:
> > ng0 transcribed 4.7K bytes:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > my editor wraps at 80 lines but I hope the errors are obvious for
> > > someone who did fix fossil before (Efraim?).
> > > Could it be that not all test
myglc2 (2017-04-10 18:56 -0400) wrote:
> Info source was included but not previously being built.
>
> From 5b757a33ffb1528621027aeecff07a7b95c5df39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: George Clemmer
> Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:31:52 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-ag: build/install info
>
> * gn
Hi Leo,
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:07:30PM +0200, Stefan Reichör wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I tried today to install Guix v12.0 on an OpenVZ hoster:
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Binary-Installation.html#Binary-Installation
>>
>> But I failed with the following problem:
>>
Alex Kost writes:
> To make it clear, this is a question about Emacs-Guix.
>
> Feng Shu (2017-04-12 07:10 +0800) wrote:
>
>> Maybe we should add three addition keybinding:
>>
>> 1. Force rebuild the package defined by the current variable definition.
>
> What do you mean? What is the analogous g
On 04/12/2017 at 18:18 Alex Kost writes:
[...]
> I added a copyright line for you and committed:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=99517d92709ee979c3507994caeb18db1eed08a6
>
> Thanks!
Thank you for the corrections. Stumbling around in the dark and happy to have
them ;-)
Pjotr Prins writes:
> Can we get rid of the alpha status? It suggests packages are in alpha,
> which they are not.
>
> I have already had two different administrators in two environments
> claiming that Guix packages can not be deployed on HPC systems because
> it is alpha.
I thought we were in
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:43:12PM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> I thought we were in beta? That's what the website homepage says now...
Was I wearing my reading glasses? Even beta we should remove for the
packages.
Pj.
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
