Leo Famulari transcribed 2.2K bytes:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:33:24PM +, ng0 wrote:
> > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.6K bytes:
> > > > On my side, people will and have asked for the intermediate time how/if
> > > > the http_proxy of Guix works. If someone has been using it with an
> > > >
Leo Famulari transcribed 2.8K bytes:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:59:56PM +, ng0 wrote:
> > before I go ahead and create an intermediate image - I'd like to explore
> > the option of getting IN-Berlin closer into the creation of the 'deploy'
> > process of Guix which is being worked on - I
tor is seriously considering to switch to rust. I have my own open
bugs / roadmap points which depend on our rust-build-system working.
tor will not switch immediately, but it shows the importance of having a
working rust-build-system. Firefox will switch at some point.
Danny, could you list what's
Just a few things:
1. We were done with this topic. For real. Don't throw gasoline at the
fire.
2. Looking at the past commits of your taylanub.github.io blog adds
just to what I thought when I read your very long reply.
3. You could've just written the last paragraph, that you agree with
neutra
Hi,
I’d like to update Epiphany to the latest release but noticed that it
needs a slightly younger version of gdk-pixbuf. Updating gdk-pixbuf to
2.36.6 would result in *many* rebuilds. “guix refresh -l gdk-pixbuf”
tells me this:
Building the following 324 packages would ensure 630 dependent
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> Huang Ying skribis:
>
>> * gnu/services/dict.scm (): Add handlers to configure
>> handlers (module instances).
>> (): Add new record type to describe handler (module
>> instance).
>> (): Add more fields.
>> (dicod-configuration-file): S
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-mando-0.3.1): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 7dfe4ba..9dd045a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.s
>From cece7ce7a1847bebf83ec83ce822313be86b2e62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Muriithi Frederick Muriuki
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:26:21 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] gnu: Add python-mando-0.3.1
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-mando-0.3.1): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 17 ++
>From cece7ce7a1847bebf83ec83ce822313be86b2e62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Muriithi Frederick Muriuki
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:26:21 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] gnu: Add python-mando-0.3.1
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-mando-0.3.1): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 17 ++
Apologies. I sent the patch for mando on the wrong thread. I have
re-sent it on the appropriate thread, so you can ignore this.
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi!
Hi!
> potluck.guixsd.org needs to be isolated from other hosts because it will
> load potluck.scm files from untrusted sources; we hope the sandbox works
> but we need a bit of defense-in-depth.
Well now I see the motivation behind (ice-9 sandbox) ... :)
> As I mention
Christopher Allan Webber transcribed 1.8K bytes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
> > Hi!
>
> Hi!
>
> > potluck.guixsd.org needs to be isolated from other hosts because it will
> > load potluck.scm files from untrusted sources; we hope the sandbox works
> > but we need a bit of defense-in-depth.
>
> Well
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:27:40AM +, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari transcribed 2.8K bytes:
> > And you will probably want a non-graphical GRUB menu as well (this
> > should be parameterized eventually...):
>
> Yeah, that would be useful as it is not uncommon for servers.
I'm working on it today.
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 10:55:27AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’d like to update Epiphany to the latest release but noticed that it
> needs a slightly younger version of gdk-pixbuf. Updating gdk-pixbuf to
> 2.36.6 would result in *many* rebuilds. “guix refresh -l gdk-pixbuf”
> tells
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:58:41AM +, ng0 wrote:
> tor is seriously considering to switch to rust. I have my own open
> bugs / roadmap points which depend on our rust-build-system working.
> tor will not switch immediately, but it shows the importance of having a
> working rust-build-system. Fi
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:27:40AM +, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari transcribed 2.8K bytes:
> > And you will probably want a non-graphical GRUB menu as well (this
> > should be parameterized eventually...):
>
> Yeah, that would be useful as it is not uncommon for servers.
Here's a patch that work
The description of "replaces the likes of autools, cmake" makes sense, but
I'm not sure I understand the more advanced features being described -
specifically "... should ultimately be able to run complex workflows on
multiple servers...". Does that just mean that the build process should be
able t
Hello Taylan,
This is guix-devel and this discussion is off-topic. Furthermore:
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> Lastly, a trivial data point about possible effects of inclusivity or
> exclusivity, should our Code of Conduct mandate obeying a certain
> positio
Hello,
"Huang, Ying" skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> While I was at it, I wrote a simple test for the dicod service:
>>
>>
>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=985a8599ed742053b52ac85f753c4feb54af93cb
>>
>> It uses the example handler that you
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:58:41AM +, ng0 wrote:
>> tor is seriously considering to switch to rust. I have my own open
>> bugs / roadmap points which depend on our rust-build-system working.
>> tor will not switch immediately, but it shows the importance of having a
>>
Hi!
It looks like we’re doing okay now? There are still a number of
armhf-linux builds pending, but if everything goes well, I think we
should merge tomorrow (Sunday). WDYT?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Hello!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> As an interlude, here is how a user would enter an environment that has
> a potluck package "foo" using Guix (using a pack is also possible). We
> start with setup steps:
>
> (1) Install Guix as a user. (This needs to be easier.)
> (2) guix channel add potluck
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 12:30:28AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It looks like we’re doing okay now? There are still a number of
> armhf-linux builds pending, but if everything goes well, I think we
> should merge tomorrow (Sunday). WDYT?
Yes, I like this plan.
signature.asc
Descrip
Hi,
I saw this in guix/scripts.build.scm:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(and (build-derivations store drv mode)
(for-each show-derivation-outputs drv)
(for-each (cut register-root store <> <>)
(map (lambda (drv)
(m
Hi,
The Guix manual has a fantastic section on the "Perfect Setup" for
hacking on Guix ((guix) The Perfect Setup). This section provides
excellent guidance for a newbie on how they can set up their development
environment for hacking on Guix. I found it tremendously useful when I
was starting ou
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Beside, related to Chris’ comment, I’m a bit concerned about versioning
> in such a widely distributed repo. The package graph in Guix has zero
> degrees of liberty: every package is connected to other packages; every
> Guix user sees the exact same graph.
26 matches
Mail list logo
