l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Federico,
>
> Federico Beffa skribis:
>
>> Say, developer A distributes such an archive A and developer B
>> distributes archive B (a different program/library) and someone C
>> installs both.
>
> Interestingly composability (what happens when you unpac
John Darrington writes:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 17:40:27 -0500
> Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> > The important thing is to not assume someone's preferred pronouns
> > without knowing them. Singular they
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>
> ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to by
> a partcular set of pronouns I will attempt to do so, but may occasionally
> forget if that person wants feminine pronouns and is
John Darrington writes:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
> >
> > ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to
> by
> > a partcular set of pronouns I will attempt to do so, but may
> occasionally
> > forget if t
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:17:28AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
Perhaps we have to agree to disagree on singular they, but I hope we can
still agree on the following statements from my earlier email:
I agree to a slightly edited version:
-
[...] som
Ludovic Courtès (2017-03-16 23:29 +0100) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2017-03-15 17:14 +0100) wrote:
>>
>>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>>
Hello, I've noticed that several packages contain "@code" structures in
their synopses, but only 'description' field supports texinfo
Kei Kebreau (2017-03-19 17:03 -0400) wrote:
> This is interesting. Which module contains the definition for the
> 'every' procedure?
(srfi srfi-1)
You can read the documentation for 'every' in the Guile manual:
(info "(guile) SRFI-1 Searching")
--
Alex
2017-03-20 7:36 GMT+01:00 John Darrington :
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 17:40:27 -0500
> Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> > The important thing is to not assume someone's preferred pronouns
> > without knowing t
John Darrington (2017-03-20 07:38 +0100) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:18:39AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:03:03AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> > > +(source (origin
> > > + (method url-fetch)
> > > +
2017-03-20 11:44 GMT+01:00 John Darrington :
>
> There is a broad concensus that Donald Trump, Rodrigo Duterte and
> Recep Erdogan are awesome.However I do not agree.
>
It seems to me that, on some issues you perfectly agree with those three.
John Darrington writes:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:17:28AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
>
> Perhaps we have to agree to disagree on singular they, but I hope we can
> still agree on the following statements from my earlier email:
>
> I agree to a slightly edited version:
>
>
Erm. Despite the obvious intelligence of all Guix participants I think
we ought to stick to technical issues on this mailing list (i.e.,
guix-technical).
Maybe we can fork these recent discussions to guix-ethical or
guix-culture? We all have good intentions, that is the general
assumption! But I
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:21:59PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
My intention was to call-back to my impression of other parts of this
conversation where it seemed you were point-blank refusing to
acknowledge ng0's request.
As I recall, their request was that I always use "sin
Pjotr Prins transcribed 0.4K bytes:
> Erm. Despite the obvious intelligence of all Guix participants I think
> we ought to stick to technical issues on this mailing list (i.e.,
> guix-technical).
>
> Maybe we can fork these recent discussions to guix-ethical or
> guix-culture? We all have good in
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote:
Erm. Despite the obvious intelligence of all Guix participants I think
we ought to stick to technical issues on this mailing list (i.e.,
guix-technical).
Maybe we can fork these recent discussions to guix-ethica
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:05:11PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
You don't need any additional "plugins" for this, as Emacs couldn't miss
it!
To check it, run "emacs -Q", paste this:
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (string-append "mir
Hi again!
I’ve written about ‘guix pack’ here:
https://gnu.org/s/guix/news/creating-bundles-with-guix-pack.html
Thanks to rekado & jonsger on IRC for the quick review!
Ludo’.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix! Hello 2.2 Guilers!
>
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
>> I’d like to move support for Docker (currently in ‘guix archive’) to
>> this new command because I think it’s more appropriate: ‘guix archive’
>> is supposed to be rather low-level so it wou
Hi,
Federico Beffa skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hi Federico,
>>
>> Federico Beffa skribis:
>>
>>> Say, developer A distributes such an archive A and developer B
>>> distributes archive B (a different program/library) and someone C
>>> installs both.
>>
>> Interestingly
Howdy!
John Darrington skribis:
> As I recall, their request was that I always use "singular they" and never to
> mention other possible alternatives to anyone. I acknowledge their request
> and
> recognise their every right to make it. But I feel no obligation to comply
> with
> their req
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:27:48PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Howdy!
John Darrington skribis:
> As I recall, their request was that I always use "singular they" and
never to
> mention other possible alternatives to anyone. I acknowledge their
request and
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi,
>
>>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary")
>>+ "fpc-bin.tar")
>>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar")
>
> Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't it be untarred immediately from
>
John Darrington writes:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to by
> a partcular set of pronouns I will attempt to do so, but may occasionally
> forget if that person wants feminine pronouns and
Clément Lassieur writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hello Guix! Hello 2.2 Guilers!
>>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>>
>>> I’d like to move support for Docker (currently in ‘guix archive’) to
>>> this new command because I think it’s more appropriate: ‘guix archive’
>>> is sup
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:09:33AM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
John Darrington writes:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to by
> a partcular set of pronoun
Excellent article, thanks for writing and sharing!
Alex
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi again!
>
> I’ve written about ‘guix pack’ here:
>
> https://gnu.org/s/guix/news/creating-bundles-with-guix-pack.html
>
> Thanks to rekado & jonsger on IRC for the quick review!
>
> Ludo’.
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Clément Lassieur writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>>> As of right now, ‘guix pack’ can create Docker image (‘guix archive’
>>> can no longer do that):
>>>
>>> guix pack guile-next -S /opt/guile-2.2.0= -f docker
>>>
>>> I’d be grateful if someone could che
John Darrington skribis:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:09:33AM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> John Darrington writes:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote:
> > ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:49:13PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John, people have explained things at length already; you can re-read
the project???s code of conduct if in doubt. This isn???t up for debate.
Please stop playing this game right now.
Ludo,
* I am not pla
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:05:04AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> So, here’s a plan:
>
> • Once Efraim has pushed some of the aarch64 patches, do another
> evaluation of the “core” package set for that branch, and check for
> anything wrong. From there on, forbid full-rebuild changes.
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi,
>
>>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary")
>>+ "fpc-bin.tar")
>>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar")
>
> Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't it be untarred immediately from
Hartmut,
On 20/03/17 20:57, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> htgoebel pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
[...]
> ;; make Qt render "offscreen", required for tests
A very minor detail, but since it's repeated here so many times:
whole-line, ‘;;’-style comments should be full sentences
Hello,
since the installation process is quite manual, takes long and ends in a
VM image for users who don't want to replace their current system, I
think there should be at least an option to download a tar file with the
content of a preconfigured root file system.
Then one could just extract it
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes:
> On 03/12/2017 07:41 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>> Hello Florian,
>>
>> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes:
>>
>>> On 03/12/2017 03:49 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
Sensitive requests should be done with an
authentification mechanism which is not d
Hi,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> 2.1 The testing infrastructure
>> ──
>>
>> Currently Cuirass is providing a small test suite consisting only of
>> unit tests. The integration tests are done manually with basic
>> examples consisting in building sma
Hello,
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Sun 12 Mar 2017 15:49, Mathieu Lirzin writes:
>
>> Here is my proposal for the Google Summer of Code 2017.
>
> Looks great to me. FWIW I think you may want to use Fibers in Cuirass.
> Sometimes a web API request might need to "fork" off a number of tasks,
> and F
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Danny Milosavljevic writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary")
>>>+ "fpc-bin.tar")
>>>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar")
>>
>> Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't
First of all, I have no clue why my email was explicitly listed in the
CC:; I'll assume that was in error.
Second, it is not my intention to insult or offend anyone here, but
some people seem to be rather thin-skinned about (possibly pretend)
slights. However, I feel I should toss my hat into the
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi ng0,
>
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:50:26 +
> ng0 wrote:
>
>> What I take from the discussion is, all is good to go except for
>> subsystems. I'm okay with reviewing subsystems as an individual patch
>> later on. For me this works. Push the 3 patches, and send the
* gnu/packages/fontutils.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add LDFLAGS=lpthread.
* gnu/packages/image.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add LDFLAGS=lpthread.
---
gnu/packages/fontutils.scm | 1 +
gnu/packages/image.scm | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/fontuti
This patch fixes a number of failures in core-updates. I don't know
if there is a better way of doing it, or why it is suddenly necessary.
gnu: Add LDFLAGS=-lpthread to configure-flags where needed.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:22:11AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> * gnu/packages/fontutils.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add
> LDFLAGS=lpthread.
> * gnu/packages/image.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add LDFLAGS=lpthread.
I'll wait for somebody else to review the code changes (I don't
unde
John Darrington writes:
> [CC guix-devel@gnu.org]
>
> So we have to make a choice:
>
> 1. Package a released program with a known vulnerability; or
> 2. Package an unreleased git snapshot.
>
> Which is the lesser evil?
I choose option two. I'm quite uncomfortable with packaging software
that is
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 02:41:09PM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
No, normally gschemas.compiled is one file storing information about all
GSettings application. It must thus be created from files provided by
multiple packages.
For example, gnome-calculator ship
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 01:36:31PM -0400, John Darrington wrote:
> [CC guix-devel@gnu.org]
>
> So we have to make a choice:
>
> 1. Package a released program with a known vulnerability; or
Although all non-trivial software contains bugs, many of which can be
exploited, we should not add new pack
45 matches
Mail list logo
