Am 23.12.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Danny Milosavljevic:
> Also, why use the magical value 0 for gid? Why not likewise (gid_t) -1 ?
The "magic value" for gid is -1, too, as you can see in
nix/nix-daemon/nix-daemon.cc.
gid 0 is not used as a magic value. As you can read in the comment, the
test just pr
Thomas Danckaert writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> this patch enables HDF4 support in the netCDF package.
>
> By the way, I noticed some error messages from doxygen during the
> build:
>
> error: Problems running dot: exit code=127, command='dot',
> arguments='"/tmp/guix-build-netcdf-4.4.1.1.drv-0/netcdf-
I'm having a hard time getting hplip and cups to recognize the
PPD for my printer (one of those which are not network enabled,
which is why I feel safe enough sharing the model and serial
numbers here).
Starting at https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2016-12-24#T1240133
you can find the discussion adfe
Thomas Danckaert writes:
> From b4b54b695e286c19332600c38d5e07fabee409f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Danckaert
> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:06:43 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-netcdf4.
>
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-netcdf4): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/pytho
ng0 writes:
> I'm having a hard time getting hplip and cups to recognize the
> PPD for my printer (one of those which are not network enabled,
> which is why I feel safe enough sharing the model and serial
> numbers here).
> Starting at https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2016-12-24#T1240133
> you ca
"Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer\"" writes:
> I struggled for days with the following bug and ultimately decided to
> disable tests for 1.73 to sidestep it entirely; tests should be
> re-enabled with the next release.
>
> https://github.com/DanBloomberg/leptonica/issues/224
OK! I'm not familiar wit
Stefan Reichör writes:
> From 06958884c4a29f43b9ade58a950b95bf9046d9f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefan Reichoer
> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 22:06:15 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add httpstat.
>
> * gnu/packages/networking.scm (httpstat): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/networking.scm |
Leo Famulari writes:
> This patch fixes CVE-2016-4658 and CVE-2016-5131 in libxml2.
>
> I noticed that Debian applied several more upstream changes to their
> package:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-xml-sgml/libxml2.git/tree/debian/patches
>
> Here is the upstream repository:
>
> http
Hi,
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:08:44 +
ng0 wrote:
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File
> > "/gnu/store/95vp3r6n9z7s85achc7a0b8aay1k73qq-hplip-3.16.11/share/hplip/setup.py",
> > line 560, in
> > desc = nickname_pat.search(nickname).group(1)
> > TypeError: cannot use a string p
John Darrington writes:
> We can argue about this till we're blue in the face.
>
> But on a pragmatic level, Mark's question demonstrates perfectly
> that our current system is lacking.
No it doesn't. Our convention, taken from the GNU coding standards, is
that the rationale for non-obvious cod
Marius Bakke writes:
> "Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer\"" writes:
>
>> I struggled for days with the following bug and ultimately decided to
>> disable tests for 1.73 to sidestep it entirely; tests should be
>> re-enabled with the next release.
>>
>> https://github.com/DanBloomberg/leptonica/issue
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 03:39:43PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > This patch fixes CVE-2016-4658 and CVE-2016-5131 in libxml2.
> The patches LGTM. I'm confused by CVE-2016-4658, the only "affected
> products" seem to be Apple-based platforms, yet the code itself does
> not
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 10:39:40AM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
John Darrington writes:
> We can argue about this till we're blue in the face.
>
> But on a pragmatic level, Mark's question demonstrates perfectly
> that our current system is lacking.
No it d
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:20:37PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:33:19PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> >> We fixed this bug in our guile-irregex package in commit fb73f07a0fe,
>> >> but our chez-irregex and chicken pa
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 02:23:43PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:20:37PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: chicken: Fix CVE-2016-{6830,6831}.
> >>
> >> * gnu/packages/patches/chicken-CVE-2016-6830+CVE-2016-6831.patch: New file.
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 03:39:43PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > This patch fixes CVE-2016-4658 and CVE-2016-5131 in libxml2.
> >
> > I noticed that Debian applied several more upstream changes to their
> > package:
> >
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-xml-sgml
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 02:23:43PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:20:37PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: chicken: Fix CVE-2016-{6830,6831}.
>> >>
>> >> * gnu/packages/patches/chicken-CVE-2016-6830+C
John Darrington writes:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 06:11:44PM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:16:24AM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote:
> >> Hi Leo,
> >>
> >> I've responded to the feedback from you, Hartmut, and John
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 02:23:43PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:20:37PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>>> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: chicken: Fix CVE-2016-{6830,6831}.
>>> >>
>>> >> *
>>> >> gnu/pa
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 06:03:45PM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote:
Why is the wrapper not good here? What would be a better solution?
Here's why I think the wrapper produced by 'wrap-program' is a good
solution in this case:
* The wrapper script allows us to package t
20 matches
Mail list logo
