The GuixSD package page
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/
is getting somewhat large to load. It is also bit short sighted to list
all packages on one html page. Any plans what to with this?
Adam Pribyl
* gnu/packages/lua.scm (lua5.1-sec-0.5): New variable.
* gnu/packages/messaging.scm (prosody):
[inputs]: Change lua5.1-sec to lua5.1-sec-0.5.
---
gnu/packages/lua.scm | 13 +
gnu/packages/messaging.scm | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/guix/fr.po
(We can arrange things so that in the
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Looks good. Push it!
>
I'm irritated that 1b35fea19f4675e9491479c4fb09a626357716db ended
up with the remark "reported by ng0" as I did not report it, I've
sent a patch. I'm just not so much on irc this week, that's why I
keep going offline.
I still can't push
Adam Pribyl writes:
> The GuixSD package page
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/
>
> is getting somewhat large to load. It is also bit short sighted to
> list all packages on one html page. Any plans what to with this?
>
> Adam Pribyl
>
>
Yes, it's not ideal. We had some discussions
Efraim,
(A detail:)
Efraim Flashner schreef op 2016-11-10 18:22:
"DESTDIR=\"\"")
Are those quotes needed to work around some silliness in the Makefile?
Otherwise,
"DESTDIR="
should work just as well and is easier on the eyes.
Kind regards,
T G-R
ng0 writes:
>
> I'm irritated that 1b35fea19f4675e9491479c4fb09a626357716db ended
> up with the remark "reported by ng0" as I did not report it, I've
> sent a patch.
Sorry about that. After reducing the patch to two lines, there was still
a copyright line added, which felt out-of-place for a sim
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:18:51AM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Efraim,
>
> (A detail:)
>
> Efraim Flashner schreef op 2016-11-10 18:22:
> >"DESTDIR=\"\"")
>
> Are those quotes needed to work around some silliness in the Makefile?
>
> Otherwise,
>
> "DESTDIR="
>
Marius Bakke writes:
> ng0 writes:
>
>> Full reason in the projects own words:
>> http://milkytracker.titandemo.org/news/2016/11/09/website-back-up-and-running/
>
> Thanks! They still provide the same releases on the new home page, so I
> pushed a two-line version of this as 1b35fea19f4675e9491
Hi!,
>> $ /gnu/store/ynpd0qpppl0fdh252wns87d158pbdx8q-hello-2.10/bin/hello
>> Hello, world!
>>
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux bilbo 3.16.0-4-powerpc #1 Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 (2016-09-03) ppc
>> GNU/Linux
>
> Woohoo! Congrats! \o/
Thanks :)
>> I am unsure on the best way to integrate my changes upstr
ng0 writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> ng0 writes:
>>
>>> Full reason in the projects own words:
>>> http://milkytracker.titandemo.org/news/2016/11/09/website-back-up-and-running/
>>
>> Thanks! They still provide the same releases on the new home page, so I
>> pushed a two-line version of thi
Am 10.11.2016 um 08:55 schrieb Efraim Flashner:
> > + ;; location for daemon state files and internal configuration
> > + ;; needs to be writeable
I wonder if this shouldn't be the default for gnu-build-system?
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe
Am 10.11.2016 um 22:14 schrieb John Darrington:
> +(define-public util-linux/base
>(package
> -(name "util-linux")
> +(name "util-linux-base")
I'm in favour of naming the variable as the package. This eases using them.
> +(define-public util-linux
> + (package
> +(inherit util-li
Hi Ludo,
> I prefer that setting PATH to point to the right GRUB, rather than
> having to carry the directory name of GRUB in 10 different places.
I much prefer not having a magical non-Guile variable influence which
bootloader (!) is installed. Of all things this is the most sensitive part of
Hi,
> Personally I'm in favor of erasing the /packages page (until we
> have an improved alternative), no one likes pages which kill your
> browser process
FWIW, I still have a [very] low internet band, I'm using epiphany, and it loads
the
page in less then a second here. I personnaly think it
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:43:32PM +0100, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
Am 10.11.2016 um 22:14 schrieb John Darrington:
> +(define-public util-linux/base
>(package
> -(name "util-linux")
> +(name "util-linux-base")
I'm in favour of naming the variable as the
I deleted my local copy of the guix repository and rebuilt it guix
from source again, and somehow, this fixed the issue with the X.509
certificates.
I can't really explain what was causing the issue, seeing as I'd even
installed nss-certs, but it was still failing.
I guess this is one way to solv
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:44:41 +0100
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Hello Julien,
>
> Seems like the original reviewer (hi Marius! ;-)) missed this
> revision, so here are a few comments.
>
> Julien Lepiller skribis:
>
> > From 94c512aa3c9710b65b6fce0cd108744a7c308c63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:0
Am 11.11.2016 um 17:03 schrieb John Darrington:
>
> > +(define-public util-linux
> > + (package
> > +(inherit util-linux/base)
> > +(name "util-linux")
> > +(source (origin (inherit (package-source util-linux/base
>
> I'm curious: Why do you
I have added a package definition for ruby-net-http-digest-auth and
created the patch.
Please find it attached.
--
Frederick M. Muriithi
From 74daa07591f97fe9eb149781f3102490d5b93c71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Muriithi Frederick Muriuki
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 19:39:48 +0300
Subject: [PATCH
David Pirotte writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Personally I'm in favor of erasing the /packages page (until we
>> have an improved alternative), no one likes pages which kill your
>> browser process
>
> FWIW, I still have a [very] low internet band, I'm using epiphany, and it
> loads the
> page in less then
Hello!
Adam Pribyl skribis:
> The GuixSD package page
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/
>
> is getting somewhat large to load. It is also bit short sighted to
> list all packages on one html page. Any plans what to with this?
It’s a shame indeed and we should definitely add JS cod
>> guix/build/download.scm:383:6: In procedure tls-wrap:
>> guix/build/download.scm:383:6: X.509 certificate of 'static.nvd.nist.gov'
>> could not be verified:
>> signer-not-found
>> invalid
That's interesting, I have a similar problem after rebuilding my GuixSD
system from latest git and re
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 05:40:51PM +0100, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
Am 11.11.2016 um 17:03 schrieb John Darrington:
>
> > +(define-public util-linux
> > + (package
> > +(inherit util-linux/base)
> > +(name "util-linux")
> > +
* website/www.scm (%web-pages): Add prototype code for generating our
packages pages.
* website/www/packages.scm (all-packages): Re-factor to
`packages-by-grouping`.
(paginated-packages-page): New procedure.
(packages-page): Tweak for use by `paginated-packages-page` as well as
standalone
Hello,
Following from repeated discussions on the mailing list about the
packages page, here a rough attempt at fixing the issue.
The patch below adds/modifies procedures so we can generate a packages
page for each "starting character" of package names.
The idea would be that we have a page for
26 matches
Mail list logo
