On Wed 16 Dec 2015 23:14, Leo Famulari writes:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 08:04:19AM +, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> On Tue 15 Dec 2015 22:58, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> > Andy Wingo skribis:
>> >
>> >> * gnu/services/mail.scm: New file.
>> >
>> > Regarding the Schemefied configuration
Hi Guix,
Bioconductor is a large, popular repository of R packages for
bioinformatics. It has coordinated, versioned releases (latest stable
release is 3.2).
The attached patches generalise the existing procedures used by the CRAN
importer, so that with only little effort importers for other R
r
Ben Woodcroft writes:
>> What do you think?
> I think you are quite valiant. As I say, I cannot be confident in my
> testing (even those in the readme). The diff looked mostly fine by eye,
> but there was some issues near the end which mangled things somewhat
What was mangled?
> (although ma
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> In addition to the a packaging tutorial, I would also like a
> deployment tutorial where explain how to do system configuration and
> how to create a caching server/build server in a few steps.
>
> The information is there in the main docs (and source code), but what
> we l
On 2015-12-17 00:04, Thompson, David wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:36 PM, 宋文武 wrote:
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome-shell): New variable.
Woohoo!
- Dave
Whoohooo²!!!
I'll install :)
Thnaks Guixs!
--
Daniel Pimentel (d4n1 3:)
On 2015-12-16 22:04, Thompson, David wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:36 PM, 宋文武 wrote:
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome-shell): New variable.
Woohoo!
Awesome! Thanks for the hard work 宋文武 :)
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Wed 16 Dec 2015 23:14, Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 08:04:19AM +, Andy Wingo wrote:
>>> On Tue 15 Dec 2015 22:58, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> > Andy Wingo skribis:
>>> >
>>> >> * gnu/services/mail.scm: New file.
>>> >
>>> > Regard
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 08:04:19AM +, Andy Wingo wrote:
>> On Tue 15 Dec 2015 22:58, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> > Andy Wingo skribis:
>> >
>> >> * gnu/services/mail.scm: New file.
>> >
>> > Regarding the Schemefied configuration, do you think Dovecot’s
>>
Hi Guix,
attached is a patch to add libgit2. Unfortunately, I couldn’t get all
tests to pass. Does someone here have an idea how to fix them?
The tests only fail when run with “guix build”.
I run them like this:
./libgit2_clar -v -Q
And I get erros like this:
Function call failed: (ch
>From b9ef283243b792ea7ac095a203e5aea3c221f78f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:27:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add r-rcpparmadillo.
* gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-rcpparmadillo): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/statistics.scm | 28 ++
>From ee0a863d6b070aa341dd0d404115dfb046db4079 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:50:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add r-gtable.
* gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-gtable): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/statistics.scm | 19 +++
1 file chan
I feel like the amount of things I am learning and working on at the
same time doesn't give me enough time to debug the 2 recipes I have for
gnunet-gtk now with the same quality I would want to see in patches I
want to release.
Because I feel it needs to be released and I think there are some
capa
I wasn't sure if GNU commit/coding style requires to add names to
headers of files.
If it does and it is okay to just use what I used in the commit
message / id, please add those.
If it isn't okay, I can provide my legal name or shortened legal name,
I don't feel that it should matter though.
--
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 02:01:37PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> For someone willing to contribute non-trivial documentation, I cannot
> imagine Texinfo being a significant barrier. For the most part, it’s
> really trivial.
>
> WDYT?
Texinfo is quite a bit harder to read/write than Org-mode. I
>From 5eed082c01499482812c6a7b89f82dda8550e25d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Thompson
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:36:42 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add obs.
* gnu/packages/video.scm (obs): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/video.scm | 38 ++
1 file changed,
On 2015-12-17 19:58, David Thompson wrote:
* gnu/packages/video.scm (obs): New variable.
LGTM.
--
`~Eric
On 17/12/15 22:47, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Ben Woodcroft writes:
What do you think?
I think you are quite valiant. As I say, I cannot be confident in my
testing (even those in the readme). The diff looked mostly fine by eye,
but there was some issues near the end which mangled things somewhat
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Eric Bavier wrote:
> On 2015-12-17 19:58, David Thompson wrote:
>>
>> * gnu/packages/video.scm (obs): New variable.
>
>
> LGTM.
Pushed, thanks!
Hi Guixs,
I'd like a GuixSD "minimal" install and customized as:
1. Xorg minimal (there isn't xorg-minimal for example on repository);
2. Only my video drive (xf86-video-intel for example);
3. Remove other virtual-console (tty3, tty4, tty5 and tty6, because I
only use tty1/tty2 and tty7 (X11));
Torbjörn,
I dare say that technical expertise does not excuse disdain and
contempt. This behavior is actively harmful to GMP and GNU. It also
illustrates why codes of conduct are more than a cosmetic gimmick.
I hope some of your peers will recognize the issue and step up to say
that this is not
Torbjörn Granlund writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> I hope this clarifies things.
>
> Unfortunately, no.
>
> This is wasting everyone's time. Here is how:
>
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gmp+reporting+bugs
This was a very rude response. Please don't respond like this on the
lis
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> Anyway, I don't hear much enthusiasm for such a project.
I think I insisted too much on my concerns, making it sound negative;
sorry about that.
I am definitely enthusiastic about improving documentation. I think
there’s some consensus that the manual in its current form
Thompson, David writes:
> From f0109ade56e024bf4ac0b6e1ac9ce3d0592964d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Thompson
> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:30:11 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add sdl2-image.
> * gnu/packages/sdl.scm (propagated-inputs-with-sdl2): New procedure.
> (sdl2-image): N
Hi Alex!
Sorry for the late reply. I wanted to take the time to sit back, relax,
and enjoy the new stuff… and I haven’t been disappointed! :-)
This is awesome. Some queries seem to take longer on Hydra than others
(for instance, getting the list of builds of a given jobset is slow,
whereas ge
Ben Woodcroft writes:
> On 17/12/15 22:47, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Ben Woodcroft writes:
>>
What do you think?
>>> I think you are quite valiant. As I say, I cannot be confident in my
>>> testing (even those in the readme). The diff looked mostly fine by eye,
>>> but there was some issues
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> Which reminds me, is there a way of simply rolling back on a 'guix pull'
> command?
Not yet!
Ludo’.
Hi!
Dika Setya Prayogi skribis:
> can we make an offline installation media for future guixsd ? because
> it is more reliable and easy to build in slow or problematic bandwith
> like in my town
The main difficulty is that the set of packages needed depends on what
the OS configuration file cont
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/password-utils.scm (cracklib): New variable.
LGTM, thanks!
Ludo'.
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/password-utils.scm (libpwquality): New variable.
LGTM.
Ludo'.
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/samba.scm (talloc): Update to 2.1.5.
> [arguments]: Use 'modify-phases' syntax.
It uses ‘modify-phases’ and also modifies stuff in ‘wscript’, which
should be mentioned here.
It would be ideal if you could make one patch that switches to
‘modify-phases’, and the nex
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/samba.scm (tevent): New variable.
[...]
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (replace 'configure
> + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> + (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")))
> + (zero? (system* "./c
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/samba.scm (ldb): New variable.
[...]
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (replace 'configure
Same here.
Otherwise LGTM.
Ludo’.
宋文武 skribis:
> * gnu/packages/samba.scm (samba): Update to 4.3.2. Add more inputs.
> [arguments]: Use 'modify-phases' syntax.
Please mention the arguments removed (#:modules and #:imported-modules)
and the phases removed.
Otherwise LGTM.
One less user of PatchELF, good. :-)
Thank you!
Ludo
Hi,
Other than that the patch does look fine. If you confirm that this is
what you intended then I’ll push it as is.
Thanks, if you are happy. This was just supposed to be a simple update..
Sorry for the delay! It just never feels good to me to propagate
inputs. If ever this can be avoided w
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Pjotr Prins skribis:
>
>> Anyway, I don't hear much enthusiasm for such a project.
>
> I think I insisted too much on my concerns, making it sound negative;
> sorry about that.
>
> I am definitely enthusiastic about improving documentation. I think
> there’s some consen
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:31AM -0600, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> I know many of us want to get away from "stringly typed" or "string
> substitution" type solutions, and that's for very good reason. But if
> someone already has a config file that they have ready to go, that's
> good to s
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:58:15PM -0600, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> > Pjotr Prins skribis:
> >
> >> Anyway, I don't hear much enthusiasm for such a project.
> >
> > I think I insisted too much on my concerns, making it sound negative;
> > sorry about that.
> >
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:58:15PM -0600, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>> > Pjotr Prins skribis:
>> >
>> >> Anyway, I don't hear much enthusiasm for such a project.
>> >
>> > I think I insisted too much on my concerns, making it sound negat
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> 宋文武 skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/samba.scm (samba): Update to 4.3.2. Add more inputs.
>> [arguments]: Use 'modify-phases' syntax.
>
> Please mention the arguments removed (#:modules and #:imported-modules)
> and the phases removed.
>
> Otherwise LGTM.
Don
If it is technically feasibly it would be a great feature to go back
in time without resorting to using a checkout of the guix source tree
:)
Also, I have occassionally regretted doing a guix pull. When facing a
complete download on a slow internet line. Heh. Definitely a feature
request to be abl
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Thompson, David writes:
>
>> From f0109ade56e024bf4ac0b6e1ac9ce3d0592964d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: David Thompson
>> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:30:11 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add sdl2-image.
>
>> * gnu/packages/sdl.scm
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:58:15PM -0600, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> Yes, I just had conversations with one person today who was frustrated
> trying to learn how to build their first package and lamenting the lack
> of an official tutorial.
Easy as it looks ;). But yes, I'd champion a stepw
42 matches
Mail list logo
