Re: Checking signatures on source tarballs

When the code comes from a Git repository, it's possible for the source tarballs not to be signed (or not to exist at all), but for the tags in the repository to be signed at each release. In these cases, there is no signature file, but this is still a way for packagers to verify the authenticity o

Re: failing packages

On 06/10/15 21:52, Ben Woodcroft wrote: On 06/10/15 19:48, Efraim Flashner wrote: diamond: fails on non-x86_64 targets. This package is part of bioinformatics.scm so it may not be intended for non-x86_64 targets. I imagine it is safe to say so for diamond, but I've asked the authors just in cas

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ghc-transformers

On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:11:52 +0200 James David Trotter wrote: > On 13 October 2015 at 10:56, Eric Bavier wrote: > > > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:43:24 +0200 > > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > > > > > Eric Bavier skribis: > > > > > > > Although other ghc packages in haskell.scm include th

Re: failing packages

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:41:13PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > The author agrees. Patch attached. Looks good, please push, and thanks for enquiring! Andreas

Re: failing packages

On 14/10/15 23:29, Andreas Enge wrote: On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:41:13PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: The author agrees. Patch attached. Looks good, please push, and thanks for enquiring! Cool. Only, would you mind pushing please? I don't have rights.

Question about Haskell packages

Hello Guix, Yesterday i thought to myself that it would be cool to mess around with Idris , on of the dependently-typed languages. Turns out it depends on quite a lot of Hackage packages! I steamed ahead, and now i have packaged all the dependencies. One weird thing i

Re: [PATCH] gnu: abbaye: Use 'sdl-union'.

Thompson, David (2015-10-13 17:01 +0300) wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Alex Kost wrote: >> Ludovic Courtès (2015-10-12 19:35 +0300) wrote: >> >>> Alex Kost skribis: >>> >> [...] Actually, I think it will be more clear to use 'sdl-union' here, because the workaround is more

Re: failing packages

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:37:56 +1000 Ben Woodcroft wrote: > > On 14/10/15 23:29, Andreas Enge wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 08:41:13PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > >> The author agrees. Patch attached. > > Looks good, please push, and thanks for enquiring! > Cool. Only, would you mind pushin

Re: Question about Haskell packages

Paul van der Walt writes: > Hello Guix, Hello! > Yesterday i thought to myself that it would be cool to mess around with > Idris , on of the dependently-typed > languages. Turns out it depends on quite a lot of Hackage packages! I > steamed ahead, and now i have pac

Re: Locale

Hi Ricardo, On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 01:55:38PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > When using Guix on top of another distribution you should only set > GUIX_LOCPATH to make sure that only Guix programmes use the locales in > your profile. All other applications (those of the host system) will > contin

Re: Plan for 0.9.0

Alex Vong skribis: > Regarding gc, I remember I accidentally ran "guix gc" and removed all > the build dependencies like bash, glibc... Then, I realized the proper > way to run gc is to run "guix gc -d ". I wouldn’t call it “the proper way.” Most of the time, I simply want to free space on my d

Graphs are cool

Hello! The ‘guix system’ command now supports two new sub-commands: ‘extension-graph’ and ‘dmd-graph’. The former produces a Dot representation of the service extension graph, while the latter produces a Dot representation of the graph of dmd services (part of the documentation pasted below.) Co

Re: [PATCH] emacs: devel: Add indentation rules.

Alex Kost skribis: > As we are talking about it, there are a couple of workarounds in the > elisp code for the issues that were solved in Geiser 0.8. So I would > like to get rid of them and mention in the manual that Geiser 0.8 is > required. Apparently it shouldn't be done right now as it is

Re: Outdated config.scm in development repo

taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis: > I have $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/guix/latest point to a git repository Warranty void. :-) Ludo'.

Re: Plan for 0.9.0

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Dunno, I admit I’m not as enthusiastic as the other people here. :-) > > What would ‘guix gc’ (without any option) do? Show --help and exit(0)? ;) -- Mathieu Lirzin

Re: [PATCH] Add numexpr

Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > From dd27466baaf072214fe5d6663df09105890d88ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ricardo Wurmus > Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:56:15 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add python-numexpr. > > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-numexpr, python2-numexpr): New > variables. Oka

Re: Plan for 0.9.0

Mathieu Lirzin skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Dunno, I admit I’m not as enthusiastic as the other people here. :-) >> >> What would ‘guix gc’ (without any option) do? > > Show --help and exit(0)? ;) Sure we could do that, but I’m not convinced it’s an improvement. WDYT

Re: Locale

Andreas Enge skribis: > Would it make sense to declare a search path with respect to GUIX_LOCPATH > then? It’s done, but it’s in libc, so you don’t see it unless you install ‘glibc’ in your profile. Ludo’.

Re: Plan for 0.9.0

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 23:44:39 +0200 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Mathieu Lirzin skribis: > > > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > > >> Dunno, I admit I’m not as enthusiastic as the other people here. :-) > >> > >> What would ‘guix gc’ (without any option) do? > > > > Show --he