Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark H Weaver skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> Our armhf targets the same set of machines as Debian's armhf, namely the >>> ARMv7-A architecture with VFP3D16 coprocessor. So 'uname -m' must >>> output "armv7l" or better, and I guess the proces

Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-20 Thread Daniel Pimentel
On 2015-01-20 19:46, Mark H Weaver wrote: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: Mark H Weaver skribis: Our armhf targets the same set of machines as Debian's armhf, namely the ARMv7-A architecture with VFP3D16 coprocessor. So 'uname -m' must output "armv7l" or better, and I guess the proc

Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-20 Thread Mark H Weaver
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> Our armhf targets the same set of machines as Debian's armhf, namely the >> ARMv7-A architecture with VFP3D16 coprocessor. So 'uname -m' must >> output "armv7l" or better, and I guess the processor "Features" as >> reported by

Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark H Weaver skribis: > Our armhf targets the same set of machines as Debian's armhf, namely the > ARMv7-A architecture with VFP3D16 coprocessor. So 'uname -m' must > output "armv7l" or better, and I guess the processor "Features" as > reported by /proc/cpuinfo must include "vfpv3" and either "

Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-19 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 08:09:42PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Congrats on all the progress made! > > These are good news indeed! > >> It would be nice to have a couple of build machines for this platform. >> If anyone reading this wants to help, please let us know! >

Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-18 Thread Andreas Enge
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 08:09:42PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Congrats on all the progress made! These are good news indeed! > It would be nice to have a couple of build machines for this platform. > If anyone reading this wants to help, please let us know! On which kind of machines does th

Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-03 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Mark H Weaver skribis: > I'm pleased to announce that the 'wip-armhf' branch is now ready for > wider testing. So far, I've successfully used this branch to: > > (1) cross-compile armhf-linux bootstrap tarballs on my Libreboot X60, > > (2) natively compile armhf bootstrap tarballs on my Novena,

Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-02 Thread David Thompson
Mark H Weaver writes: > I'm pleased to announce that the 'wip-armhf' branch is now ready for > wider testing. > [...] > Most likely we'll find more build problems higher up in the stack, and > help with that would be most appreciated! Wow, great progress! I will start testing when my Novena arr

wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing

2015-01-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hello Guix! I'm pleased to announce that the 'wip-armhf' branch is now ready for wider testing. So far, I've successfully used this branch to: (1) cross-compile armhf-linux bootstrap tarballs on my Libreboot X60, (2) natively compile armhf bootstrap tarballs on my Novena, based on the cross