Eric Bavier writes:
> Hello Ricardo,
>
> On 2016-09-30 04:24, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> I’m in the middle of upgrading our Haskell packages. (Actually, I’m
>> just yak shaving. I need “pandoc-citeproc” for “r-knitr”…)
>>
>> I noticed that upgrading Haskell packages is a pain in
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> That sounds great! Just to be sure: you are saying that if you install
>> any library (call it A) and the GHC compiler into your profile then you
>> are able to compile your program (making use of library A) without
>> also having to manuall
Federico Beffa writes:
>>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>>
Hi Guix,
I’m in the middle of upgrading our Haskell packages. (Actually, I’m
just yak shaving. I need “pandoc-citeproc” for “r-knitr”…)
I noticed that upgrading Haskell packages is a pain in the neck because
>
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 09:45:21AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I’m preparing a patch to remove propagation from all Haskell packages.
> Now the question is only whether to do this all in one patch or in one
> patch per package… :)
I'd say whichever method is easiest :) And then we can test it w
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
>>> Hi Guix,
>>>
>>> I’m in the middle of upgrading our Haskell packages. (Actually, I’m
>>> just yak shaving. I need “pandoc-citeproc” for “r-knitr”…)
>>>
>>> I noticed that upgrading Haskell packages is a pain in the neck because
>>> of propagated inputs. It seems
Federico Beffa writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> I’m in the middle of upgrading our Haskell packages. (Actually, I’m
>> just yak shaving. I need “pandoc-citeproc” for “r-knitr”…)
>>
>> I noticed that upgrading Haskell packages is a pain in the neck because
>> of propagated
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I’m in the middle of upgrading our Haskell packages. (Actually, I’m
> just yak shaving. I need “pandoc-citeproc” for “r-knitr”…)
>
> I noticed that upgrading Haskell packages is a pain in the neck because
> of propagated inputs. It seems that not all packa
Hello Ricardo,
On 2016-09-30 04:24, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Hi Guix,
I’m in the middle of upgrading our Haskell packages. (Actually, I’m
just yak shaving. I need “pandoc-citeproc” for “r-knitr”…)
I noticed that upgrading Haskell packages is a pain in the neck because
of propagated inputs. It
Hi Guix,
I’m in the middle of upgrading our Haskell packages. (Actually, I’m
just yak shaving. I need “pandoc-citeproc” for “r-knitr”…)
I noticed that upgrading Haskell packages is a pain in the neck because
of propagated inputs. It seems that not all packages have fully
declared dependencies
