l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> In other news, these installation tests pass for me, as of
> a51cf16031c974ffa238e5dd9ced32f0d68c9227, on x86_64:
All of these pass at this commit:
PASS: /gnu/store/rdaib0mw3r81h1d87kv669z9wd49072s-installed-os
PASS: /gnu/store/9wzidlrcv38rspvai26k62h64b
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> BTW, did “we” fix access to the OverDrive by berlin.guixsd.org?
I opened a ticket to have the firewall rules adjusted but the network
security person who usually does these things is currently out sick.
Looks like it’s going to take a little longer, unfortunately.
(I
Hello!
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> make guix-binary.aarch64-linux.tar.xz works as exptected
Great, thanks for checking!
BTW, did “we” fix access to the OverDrive by berlin.guixsd.org?
In other news, these installation tests pass for me, as of
a51cf16031c974ffa238e5dd9ced32f0d68c9227, on x86_64
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 11:44:42AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Clément Lassieur skribis:
>
> > I think we need https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30602 to
> > be fixed.
>
> Done. \o/
>
> With Guile 2.2.4 now released, we can go ahead with 0.15. Could people
> build
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.1K bytes:
> Hello!
>
> Clément Lassieur skribis:
>
> > I think we need https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30602 to
> > be fixed.
>
> Done. \o/
>
> With Guile 2.2.4 now released, we can go ahead with 0.15. Could people
> build the ISO installation ima
Hello!
Clément Lassieur skribis:
> I think we need https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30602 to
> be fixed.
Done. \o/
With Guile 2.2.4 now released, we can go ahead with 0.15. Could people
build the ISO installation image and give it a try:
guix system disk-image --file-system-
Hi Kei,
> but I do have a quick question: I take it that there exists a
> script for determining the new packages and updates for each release?
> Maybe I've missed it in the repository or in discussion.
It is done with “make update-NEWS”. It depends on a checkout of the
maintenance repository
swedebugia writes:
> On June 20, 2018 8:38:46 PM GMT+02:00, Kei Kebreau
> wrote:
>
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
> On the NEWS side, here is what springs to mind:
>
> [...]
>
> * Packages can specify that some CVEs don't apply to them
>
> Around when (or what commit) was this feature introduce
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Thanks for all the ideas, I’ve updated NEWS accordingly. I’m sure we’re
> still missing a number things (so much has happened!) so more ideas are
> still welcome. :-)
>
> Ludo’.
Hi Ludo,
Looking at your changes to the log file increases
On June 20, 2018 8:38:46 PM GMT+02:00, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> On the NEWS side, here is what springs to mind:
>>
>[...]
>> * Packages can specify that some CVEs don't apply to them
>
>Around when (or what commit) was this feature introduced?
f4007b25476dfd97885f358d2dabb
Kei Kebreau writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> On the NEWS side, here is what springs to mind:
>>
> [...]
>> * Packages can specify that some CVEs don't apply to them
>
> Around when (or what commit) was this feature introduced?
It was added in commit f4007b25476dfd97885f358d2dabbd463f6f6017,
Hello Guix!
Thanks for all the ideas, I’ve updated NEWS accordingly. I’m sure we’re
still missing a number things (so much has happened!) so more ideas are
still welcome. :-)
Ludo’.
Hi Julien and Marius,
>> On the NEWS side, here is what springs to mind:
>>
>> * `guix weather` now reports CI statistics
>> * Guix will give hints for how to resolve common configuration errors
>> * RHEL6 systems are again supported
>> * Reproducibility improvements all around
>> * Lots of new su
Is it worth mentioning that guix pull for some time now
is back to relatively decent 1GB RAM consumption? I
think I had it even succeed on 512MB RAM per handwritten
notes here, but I haven't had the possibility to test again
on low specs.
Marius Bakke writes:
> On the NEWS side, here is what springs to mind:
>
[...]
> * Packages can specify that some CVEs don't apply to them
Around when (or what commit) was this feature introduced?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On June 19, 2018 2:48:49 PM GMT+02:00, Julien Lepiller
wrote:
>Le 2018-06-19 14:36, Marius Bakke a écrit :
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
... Snip...
>>
>> On the NEWS side, here is what springs to mind:
>>
>> * `guix weather` now reports CI statistics
>> * Guix will give hints for how to res
Le 2018-06-19 14:36, Marius Bakke a écrit :
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
Hi Guix,
I wrote almost 6 days ago:
Here are a bunch of things that we should look into:
* Outstanding patches. There are many patches in the queue at
guix-patches[1] that we should go through, comment on, and/or apply
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I wrote almost 6 days ago:
>
>> Here are a bunch of things that we should look into:
>>
>> * Outstanding patches. There are many patches in the queue at
>> guix-patches[1] that we should go through, comment on, and/or apply
>> before the release. Who wo
Ricardo Wurmus ezt írta (időpont: 2018. jún. 19., K,
0:17):
> Hi Guix,
>
> I wrote almost 6 days ago:
>
> > Here are a bunch of things that we should look into:
> >
> > * Outstanding patches. There are many patches in the queue at
> > guix-patches[1] that we should go through, comment on, and/
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I wrote almost 6 days ago:
>
>> Here are a bunch of things that we should look into:
>>
>> * Outstanding patches. There are many patches in the queue at
>> guix-patches[1] that we should go through, comment on, and/or apply
>> before the release. Who wo
I'd be happy to help unfortunately this month is hectic for me.
Had it been July or August I would have been more free. Sorry :(
--
Pierre Neidhardt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Guix,
I wrote almost 6 days ago:
> Here are a bunch of things that we should look into:
>
> * Outstanding patches. There are many patches in the queue at
> guix-patches[1] that we should go through, comment on, and/or apply
> before the release. Who would like to join a task force to do
Hi Ludo,
> The plan looks good to me!
>
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> * breakage since the last core-updates merge. Since the long overdue
>> merge of the “core-updates” branch we have a few serious problems on
>> i686 (e.g. the gst-plugins-base package) and armhf. Who would like to
>>
Hello!
The plan looks good to me!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> * breakage since the last core-updates merge. Since the long overdue
> merge of the “core-updates” branch we have a few serious problems on
> i686 (e.g. the gst-plugins-base package) and armhf. Who would like to
> lead an effor
Hi!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>> Can we aim for a v1.0 release? At least for the package manager? I am
>> facing people that say Guix is not mature and therefore insecure and
>> therefore they can justifiably ignore my pleas for installation
>> without even looking.
>
> I would like to leave 1.0 f
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> retiring of GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH, and more.
What alternative do you have in mind?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Pjotr,
Pjotr Prins writes:
> Can we aim for a v1.0 release? At least for the package manager? I am
> facing people that say Guix is not mature and therefore insecure and
> therefore they can justifiably ignore my pleas for installation
> without even looking.
>
> I think any outstanding featu
Hi Pjotr,
> Can we aim for a v1.0 release? At least for the package manager? I am
> facing people that say Guix is not mature and therefore insecure and
> therefore they can justifiably ignore my pleas for installation
> without even looking.
I would like to leave 1.0 for the future.
Things th
Can we aim for a v1.0 release? At least for the package manager? I am
facing people that say Guix is not mature and therefore insecure and
therefore they can justifiably ignore my pleas for installation
without even looking.
I think any outstanding features can be projected on later realeases.
Gu
Hi Guix,
all of us have been very busy fixing bugs, adding great new features,
adding packages, and managing core-updates/staging. In fact, we’ve done
so much that people installing version 0.14.0 would really miss out on a
couple of important changes. (For example, they wouldn’t even be able
to
30 matches
Mail list logo
