Re: missing patch for texlive-bin (e77412362f)

2022-02-05 Thread zimoun
Hi Tim, On Fri, 04 Feb 2022 at 23:20, Timothy Sample wrote: > Yes. I could add that commit to the database, evaluate it, and load all > the sources. I’m inclined not to, but I’m open to being convinced. (I > really like how simple the current system is conceptually.) I understand. Especiall

Re: missing patch for texlive-bin (e77412362f)

2022-02-04 Thread Timothy Sample
Hi, zimoun writes: > On Thu, 03 Feb 2022 at 10:46, Timothy Sample wrote: > >> The bad news is that 0.75 is not there. At first I was going to >> apologize for the shortcomings of the sampling approach... until I >> realized you are trying to trick me! ;) Unless I’m misreading the Git >> hist

Re: missing patch for texlive-bin (e77412362f)

2022-02-03 Thread zimoun
Hi Timothy, On Thu, 03 Feb 2022 at 10:46, Timothy Sample wrote: >> But the question is if Disarchive dissambles and preserves external >> patches. Timothy? [...] > The bad news is that 0.75 is not there. At first I was going to > apologize for the shortcomings of the sampling approach... unt

Re: missing patch for texlive-bin (e77412362f)

2022-02-03 Thread Timothy Sample
Hi zimoun, zimoun writes: > But the question is if Disarchive dissambles and preserves external > patches. Timothy? I have good news and bad news. :) The good news is that some versions of this patch are in the PoG database. There’s two versions of 0.76 and one of 0.72. Of those three, onl

Re: missing patch for texlive-bin (e77412362f)

2022-02-02 Thread zimoun
Hi Maxime, Thanks for the pointer. On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 23:57, Maxime Devos wrote: > > zimoun schreef op wo 02-02-2022 om 19:42 [+0100]: > > 2. How to preserve such patches? Other said, are they part of the > > Disarchive machinery? For now, some patches are probably missed by > > sources

Re: missing patch for texlive-bin (e77412362f)

2022-02-02 Thread Maxime Devos
zimoun schreef op wo 02-02-2022 om 19:42 [+0100]: >  2. How to preserve such patches?  Other said, are they part of the >  Disarchive machinery?  For now, some patches are probably missed by >  sources.json and thus not ingested by SWH. Can we tell SWH to ingest svntogit-packages, in such a way th

Re: missing patch for texlive-bin (e77412362f)

2022-02-02 Thread Maxime Devos
zimoun schreef op wo 02-02-2022 om 19:42 [+0100]: >  1. How to get now this patch?  Someone?  Or is it lost forever? I found it! It's in the https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/ repository (warning: 0.5 GiB). Checkout commit 155510dd18d2f290085f40d2a95a3701db4a224d, then do $ guix do

Re: missing patch for texlive-bin (e77412362f)

2022-02-02 Thread Maxime Devos
zimoun schreef op wo 02-02-2022 om 19:42 [+0100]: > [...] > > This asks two questions: > >  1. How to get now this patch? Someone? Or is it lost forever? >  2. How to preserve such patches? Other said, are they part of the >  Disarchive machinery? For now, some patches are probably missed by

missing patch for texlive-bin (e77412362f)

2022-02-02 Thread zimoun
Hi, Investigating [0], and working on rebuild a part of "Preservation of Guix", I hit a missing patch which breaks time-machine. For instance, let consider the commit e77412362f from May 2019 (post v1.0.0, I guess). --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix time-ma