Hi Arun,
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 22:03, Arun Isaac wrote:
[...]
> https://guix-forge.systemreboot.net/manual/dev/en/
[...]
> https://github.com/genenetwork/genenetwork-machines/
Cool! Thanks for sharing.
Cheers,
simon
Hi zimoun,
>> We also have ci and cd based on our own system containers in Guix.
>>
>> => https://ci.genenetwork.org/
>
> This is based on which CI code? Your own or do you use an existing CI
> framework/tools?
This CI is built using guix-forge documented at
https://guix-forge.systemreboot.net
Hi Pjotr,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 14:18, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> We also have ci and cd based on our own system containers in Guix.
>
> => https://ci.genenetwork.org/
This is based on which CI code? Your own or do you use an existing CI
framework/tools?
Cheers,
simon
Hi Giovanni,
> Please Arun is there a devel mailing list dedicated to tissue so we can
> discuss details of the project?
There isn't one yet, but I will set up a public inbox soon.
> I'm not a Guile developer but I would like to help with testing and (the
> lack of) documentation, if I can.
Y
On 23-11-2022 15:19, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
[...]
I saw your «L'Union Qiuy Fait La Force» presentation at Ten Years of
Guix [1] and I have to admit I still have to "digest" it, because I
still do not understand the overall architecture (see below).
As I (probably) mentioned it tha talk Qiuy
Pjotr Prins writes:
[...]
> We also have ci and cd based on our own system containers in Guix.
>
> => https://ci.genenetwork.org/
>
> It would be good to write a Guix blog about all this.
Yes: «How to leave useless forges and live happy» :-D
>> Please Arun is there a devel mailing list dedicat
Hello Jonathan,
nice to read you!
I saw your «L'Union Qiuy Fait La Force» presentation at Ten Years of
Guix [1] and I have to admit I still have to "digest" it, because I
still do not understand the overall architecture (see below).
indieterminacy writes:
[...]
> FWIW, Ive been working on Gem
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:29:48AM +0100, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> Homepage is https://tissue.systemreboot.net/
>
> Wow! Very interesting project, it deserves more visibility! (why did I
> miss its existance?!? :-O )
Ah well. We have just been using it and building it up over the last
year :).
Hi Giovanni,
On 23-11-2022 11:29, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
please are there updates about this initiative?
Yeah, issue tracker lives here:
=> https://issues.genenetwork.org/
The actual issues are in gemini format and can be served with a gemini
server. The HTML parser+renderer is written i
Hello Pjotr and Arun,
thanks Pjotr for the information
Pjotr Prins writes:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 06:57:59PM +0100, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
[...]
>> please are there updates about this initiative?
>
> Yeah, issue tracker lives here:
>
> => https://issues.genenetwork.org/
>
> The actual
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 06:57:59PM +0100, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> Hello Pjotr
>
> Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > As a new initiative we are discussing/designing a gemini + git issue
> > tracker.
>
> please are there updates about this initiative?
Yeah, issue tracker lives here:
Hello Pjotr
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
[...]
> As a new initiative we are discussing/designing a gemini + git issue
> tracker.
please are there updates about this initiative?
Thanks! Gio'
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Il giorno ven, 13/08/2021 alle 16.39 +0200, raingloom ha scritto:
>
> I think this might be the result of that survey?
> https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/GitHub-alternatives-for-Bitcoin-Core
yes, this is it
it seems here was no progress, since then
Pjotr Prins writes:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 06:19:23PM +0200, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
>> Hi Adriano and Ricardo,
>>
>> I'm also _very_ interested in keeping issues in the same repo as code
>> and I'm really envious of Fossil users [1] :-D
>
> As a new initiative we are discussing/designing a
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 06:19:23PM +0200, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> Hi Adriano and Ricardo,
>
> I'm also _very_ interested in keeping issues in the same repo as code
> and I'm really envious of Fossil users [1] :-D
As a new initiative we are discussing/designing a gemini + git issue
tracker.
Ra
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 08:29:07 +0200
Adriano Peluso wrote:
> Hello
>
> some time ago, in the context of an on line conference about Guix,
> someone suggested me that the bitcoin community had run a survey about
> available solutions for issue tracking in git
>
> I don't
Il giorno ven, 13/08/2021 alle 18.19 +0200, Giovanni Biscuolo ha
scritto:
> Hi Adriano and Ricardo,
thank you for your insights
achieved on that front
>
> I don’t think there was a decision to do issue tracking in git.
Do you mean a decsion by the bitcoin community ?
Or by the Guix community ?
> I have no idea how well it works when there’s a lot of “traffic”
> in a distributed project, e.g. when there are s
Hi Adriano and Ricardo,
I'm also _very_ interested in keeping issues in the same repo as code
and I'm really envious of Fossil users [1] :-D
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
[...]
> Many years ago I used Bugs Everywhere
> (https://bugs-everywhere.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) for my
> personal projects.
Hi Adriano,
some time ago, in the context of an on line conference about
Guix,
someone suggested me that the bitcoin community had run a survey
about
available solutions for issue tracking in git
Was it perhaps Carl Dong?
I don't remember the name of such person and I am wonderi
Hello
some time ago, in the context of an on line conference about Guix,
someone suggested me that the bitcoin community had run a survey about
available solutions for issue tracking in git
I don't remember the name of such person and I am wondering if amy
progress has been achieved on
21 matches
Mail list logo
