Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-06-20 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Danny Milosavljevic writes: > $ guix environment --pure --ad-hoc python-on-guile > [env]$ python > no code for module (parser stis-parser lang python3-parser) > [env]$ exit > $ guix environment --ad-hoc --pure python-on-guile guile-stis-parser > [env]$ python > no code for module (parser stis-p

Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-06-20 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
$ guix environment --pure --ad-hoc python-on-guile [env]$ python no code for module (parser stis-parser lang python3-parser) [env]$ exit $ guix environment --ad-hoc --pure python-on-guile guile-stis-parser [env]$ python no code for module (parser stis-parser lang python3-parser) pgplvs9_g1hy0.pgp

Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-06-20 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ludovic Courtès writes: >> I’ll take a look at python-on-guile and see if we can run the scripts >> with it. > > That’d be sweet! The python-on-guile package in Guix now provides a “python” executable that can run simple Python scripts. I haven’t tested this on the glibc 2.29 scripts yet. --

Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-06-02 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
n...@n0.is writes: >> Yes! ... Although...how are we -- in the far future -- going to replace >> Guile with Mes for the Guix bootstrap? Could it be that the glibc >> developers haven't seen my talk? :-/ > > Maintain a variant of glibc or your own libc? > It's not that far off for an Operating S

Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-06-01 Thread ng0
Jan Nieuwenhuizen transcribed 759 bytes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > Hi! > > >>> I started looking at what it would take to upgrade glibc to 2.29 on > >>> ‘core-updates’. Bad news: it depends on Python. > >> > >> I had to check the date. This is for real? > > > > It’s not a June 1st prank, I

Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-06-01 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hi! >>> I started looking at what it would take to upgrade glibc to 2.29 on >>> ‘core-updates’. Bad news: it depends on Python. >> >> I had to check the date. This is for real? > > It’s not a June 1st prank, I swear! Oh, great... not. >> I’ll take a look at python-on-g

Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-05-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Howdy! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: >> I started looking at what it would take to upgrade glibc to 2.29 on >> ‘core-updates’. Bad news: it depends on Python. > > I had to check the date. This is for real? It’s not a June 1st prank, I swear! Also note that I did try to pass “ac_cv_path_PYTHON_PROG

Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-05-30 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> I started looking at what it would take to upgrade glibc to 2.29 on >> ‘core-updates’. Bad news: it depends on Python. > > I had to check the date. This is for real? It's for real: --8<---cut here---start->8--- Changes to build and

Re: glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-05-30 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
> I started looking at what it would take to upgrade glibc to 2.29 on > ‘core-updates’. Bad news: it depends on Python. I had to check the date. This is for real? > Also, it would be nice to use ‘python-on-guile’ here, but it doesn’t > provide a ‘python’ executable and I don’t know if it impl

glibc 2.29 needs Python

2019-05-30 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! I started looking at what it would take to upgrade glibc to 2.29 on ‘core-updates’. Bad news: it depends on Python. I came up with the WIP patch below, but Python eventually fails to build with: --8<---cut here---start->8--- In file included from /tmp