Re: fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-03-04 Thread Andreas Enge
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:53:39PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote: > What counts for us is what we deliver, therefore the version > packaged, therefore GPL2 with no exception. gpl2+, unless the "upgrade" is explicitly excluded in the package (the license itself allows to upgrade it otherwise). Andrea

Re: fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-03-04 Thread Nils Gillmann
Changing to archive.org as recommended does not fix the mime type: building path(s) `/gnu/store/7fgpnklam8v0fbklqzmgir2ryg3hb79n-font-un-fonts-1.0.2.tar.gz' Starting download of /gnu/store/7fgpnklam8v0fbklqzmgir2ryg3hb79n-font-un-fonts-1.0.2.tar.gz >From >https://web.archive.org/web/201603040

Re: fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-03-04 Thread Nils Gillmann
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Nils Gillmann writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> >>> Nils Gillmann writes: >>> Followup: I just downloaded the debian package of the fonts and looked at its content, particulary the README.Debian. According to them, upstream looks dead

Re: fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-02-29 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Nils Gillmann writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Nils Gillmann writes: >> >>> Followup: >>> >>> I just downloaded the debian package of the fonts and looked at >>> its content, particulary the README.Debian. >>> >>> According to them, upstream looks dead, a licensing issue (use of >>> pure

Re: fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-02-29 Thread Nils Gillmann
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Nils Gillmann writes: > >> Followup: >> >> I just downloaded the debian package of the fonts and looked at >> its content, particulary the README.Debian. >> >> According to them, upstream looks dead, a licensing issue (use of >> pure GPL) exists and has been reported yea

Re: fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-02-29 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Nils Gillmann writes: > Followup: > > I just downloaded the debian package of the fonts and looked at > its content, particulary the README.Debian. > > According to them, upstream looks dead, a licensing issue (use of > pure GPL) exists and has been reported years ago, but was never > acted upon

Re: fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-02-29 Thread Nils Gillmann
Followup: I just downloaded the debian package of the fonts and looked at its content, particulary the README.Debian. According to them, upstream looks dead, a licensing issue (use of pure GPL) exists and has been reported years ago, but was never acted upon. The Debian file was signed in May 201

Re: fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-02-29 Thread Nils Gillmann
Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Nils Gillmann writes: > >> the error output (to cut down the line length here) is located >> here: https://ptpb.pw/EFI5 > > This looks like a server configuration error. > Okay, thanks for looking into that. > rekado in ~: wget -qS > https://kldp.net/frs/download.php/

Re: fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-02-28 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Nils Gillmann writes: > the error output (to cut down the line length here) is located > here: https://ptpb.pw/EFI5 This looks like a server configuration error. rekado in ~: wget -qS https://kldp.net/frs/download.php/4695/un-fonts-core-1.0.2-080608.tar.gz HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Mon, 29 Fe

fonts.scm -> packaging "un-fonts", download isses

2016-02-28 Thread Nils Gillmann
I try to package/import some leftovers from gentoo I have, currently the fontset "un-fonts". I get some errors while trying to download it. Currently it's based on another font package where I try to adopt my existing ebuild into. Here is the package definition and the output: (define-public font-