Hi!
Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
>> we have lots of nice macros and procedures in Guix that aren’t
>> documented beyond their docstrings.
>>
>> Should we snarf the docstrings and add them to the manual?
>
> If you are talking about guix records and (guix build utils); I think it
> would be great i
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
Hello Ricardo
> we have lots of nice macros and procedures in Guix that aren’t
> documented beyond their docstrings.
>
> Should we snarf the docstrings and add them to the manual?
If you are talking about guix records and (guix build utils); I think it
would be great if th
Hi Ricardo, Guix
On +2019-12-20 23:17:41 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> we have lots of nice macros and procedures in Guix that aren’t
> documented beyond their docstrings.
>
> Should we snarf the docstrings and add them to the manual?
>
> --
> Ricardo
>
>
My 2 cents, if I may:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 09:04:16PM -0700, Jesse Gibbons wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 23:17 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > Hi Guix,
> >
> > we have lots of nice macros and procedures in Guix that aren’t
> > documented beyond their docstrings.
> >
> > Should we snarf the docstrings and add them
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 23:17 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> we have lots of nice macros and procedures in Guix that aren’t
> documented beyond their docstrings.
>
> Should we snarf the docstrings and add them to the manual?
>
> --
> Ricardo
>
>
I don't care where it goes, but is th
Hi Ricardo,
Yes! I think that would really emphasize the hackability of Guix.
- John
Hi Guix,
we have lots of nice macros and procedures in Guix that aren’t
documented beyond their docstrings.
Should we snarf the docstrings and add them to the manual?
--
Ricardo
