On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:47:53PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> For some reason even the updated patches didn’t apply correctly, so I
> applied them manually (maybe it’s a problem on my end). I’ve tested
> biber on one of my old projects and it works as expected:
>
> --8<---cut here
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 03:26:07PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:26:56AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>> > If we upgrade those two, I’m pretty sure we won’t need Biber 2.5 any
>>> > more and can replace it with what
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:44:41AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > The attached patches update texlive to 2017 and remove biber-2.5.
> > Ricardo, can you check if biber@2.7 works with these patches?
>
> These patches don’t apply cleanly to core-updates since the merge of
>
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 12:14:47PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 06:38:48PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > The attached patches update texlive to 2017 and remove biber-2.5.
>
> I did not follow the new modular texlive packages, but it looks as if
> at the same oc
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 03:26:07PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:26:56AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> > If we upgrade those two, I’m pretty sure we won’t need Biber 2.5 any
>> > more and can replace it with what is currently biber-next.
>> >
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 06:38:48PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> The attached patches update texlive to 2017 and remove biber-2.5.
I did not follow the new modular texlive packages, but it looks as if
at the same occasion texlive-minimal could be removed? I added it only
to have a smaller p
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 03:26:07PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:26:56AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > If we upgrade those two, I’m pretty sure we won’t need Biber 2.5 any
> > more and can replace it with what is currently biber-next.
> >
> > I would suggest not to spe
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:26:56AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> If we upgrade those two, I’m pretty sure we won’t need Biber 2.5 any
> more and can replace it with what is currently biber-next.
>
> I would suggest not to spend too much time on Biber 2.5 as it is on its
> way out — it just needs
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:26:56AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> We haven’t yet updated the big texlive and texlive-bin packages to the
> 2017 versions. (Actually, I have tested an update for the texlive-bin
> package, but not for “texlive-texmf”.)
>
> If we upgrade those two, I’m pretty sure we
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 04:23:43PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> Ricardo added biber-2.5 in 253cdd6c1464c944be2418ee9161f5f5b57e0eee.
>> Ricardo, can you check if it's still necessary?
>
> I tried to find out myself, but the location of the relevant information
> is not do
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 04:23:43PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Ricardo added biber-2.5 in 253cdd6c1464c944be2418ee9161f5f5b57e0eee.
> Ricardo, can you check if it's still necessary?
I tried to find out myself, but the location of the relevant information
is not documented in our packaging.
> > A
11 matches
Mail list logo
