Leo Famulari writes:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 02:17:33PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> * Disable substitutes for relevent packages. Technically correct as
>> license incompatibility is only triggered on transmission of binary,
>> though maybe missing something about the spirit of the G
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 02:17:33PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> * Disable substitutes for relevent packages. Technically correct as
> license incompatibility is only triggered on transmission of binary,
> though maybe missing something about the spirit of the GPL.
Maybe, but did anyone wi
Vagrant Cascadian schreef op vr 22-10-2021 om 14:15 [-0700]:
> [...]
> Though, it is *possible* that various u-boot-BOARD in some cases
> doesn't
> include any openssl code at all in the resulting binaries, but builds
> some tools used during the build process, that are then used to
> produce
> var
On 2021-10-21, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> For the last couple years guix has been applying simple workarounds in
> u-boot packages to disable the features that required openssl due to
> GPL/openssl license incompatibilities.
>
> I made an attempt at updating guix to u-boot 2021.10, which seems to
>
On 2021-10-22, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:17:03PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> While openssl 3.0 is licensed compatibly with GPLv3, u-boot has portions
>> which are GPLv2-only, so that's not as attractive of a way forward as
>> one might hope for...
>
> What are other di
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 11:17:03PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> While openssl 3.0 is licensed compatibly with GPLv3, u-boot has portions
> which are GPLv2-only, so that's not as attractive of a way forward as
> one might hope for...
What are other distros doing? Surely we can't be the only gr
On 2019-03-08, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>> I'm not sure where it would be appropriate to add more comments
>> regarding the GPL/Openssl incompatibilities; e.g. if someone were to
>> propose adding one of the u-boot targets that requires it, they might
>> just go ahead an