Re: branch naming conventions [was Re: Guix Day: Notes from the CI session]

2021-02-12 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 04:14:24PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > >> My concern about that is that it basically swaps what we hav

Re: branch naming conventions [was Re: Guix Day: Notes from the CI session]

2021-02-11 Thread Leo Famulari
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> My concern about that is that it basically swaps what we have now. Using > >> -frozen makes it a bit clearer that we're building it

Re: branch naming conventions [was Re: Guix Day: Notes from the CI session]

2021-02-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Leo Famulari skribis: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> My concern about that is that it basically swaps what we have now. Using >> -frozen makes it a bit clearer that we're building it out. > > Good idea, I like it. +1 Would someone be willing to add a coupl

Re: branch naming conventions [was Re: Guix Day: Notes from the CI session]

2021-02-10 Thread Leo Famulari
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > My concern about that is that it basically swaps what we have now. Using > -frozen makes it a bit clearer that we're building it out. Good idea, I like it.

branch naming conventions [was Re: Guix Day: Notes from the CI session]

2021-02-10 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 04:46:36PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > ## Open issue: branching strategy > > > > - currently: building all of `master` + the "core" of `core-updates` > > - schedule > > - currently ad-hoc: volunte