Ludovic Courtès (2015-06-19 11:26 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
[...]
>> I agree, getting an error is better than a broken link, so I'm for
>> making (#:recursive? #f) a default. And resolving symlinks would
>> probably be even better.
>
> Done in commits 020f3e4 and 7833db1.
I see, thank
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2015-06-15 23:44 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
>>> If one uses a relative symlink in 'local-file', it will lead to a broken
>>> symlink in the store as illustrated in the attached example. So I think
>>> it either:
>>>
>>> - should be documented
Ludovic Courtès (2015-06-15 23:44 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> If one uses a relative symlink in 'local-file', it will lead to a broken
>> symlink in the store as illustrated in the attached example. So I think
>> it either:
>>
>> - should be documented explicitly that 'local-file' ad
Alex Kost skribis:
> If one uses a relative symlink in 'local-file', it will lead to a broken
> symlink in the store as illustrated in the attached example. So I think
> it either:
>
> - should be documented explicitly that 'local-file' adds a specified
> file to the store blindly, which may l
If one uses a relative symlink in 'local-file', it will lead to a broken
symlink in the store as illustrated in the attached example. So I think
it either:
- should be documented explicitly that 'local-file' adds a specified
file to the store blindly, which may lead to the problem with a broken
