On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:44:34AM -0700, Timothy Sample wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:38:45AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> >> In my opinion “--only-substitutes” should stop and report a list.
> >> If it continued without complaining there could be problems:
> >>
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> In the future I was also thinking that the build farm could tag Git
> commits that it has fully built, and thus ‘guix pull’ could be told to
> pull to the latest fully-built commit.
I like this quite a bit. In fact, this is more in the spirit of what I
wan
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> BTW, should --only-substitutes filter out packages without a substitute,
>> or should it simply stop and report the list of missing substitutes
>> (after which the user could use --do-not-upgrade)?
>
> In my opinion “--only-substitutes” shou
On Sun, Jun 18 2017, Timothy Sample wrote:
> While the user experience would suffer a bit, it’s no real hardship to
> type
>
> $ guix package \
> --do-not-upgrade $(guix package --only-substitutes -u) \
> -u
>
> This is definitely possible.
Just checking: is the proposal that
Timothy Sample writes:
>>> In my opinion “--only-substitutes” should stop and report a list.
>>> If it continued without complaining there could be problems:
>>>
>>> * partial upgrades could leave the profile in an unusable state
>
> Maybe I don’t understand Guix that well yet, but I don’t think
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:38:45AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>> > BTW, should --only-substitutes filter out packages without a substitute,
>> > or should it simply stop and report the list of missing substitutes
>> > (after which the u
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:38:45AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> > BTW, should --only-substitutes filter out packages without a substitute,
> > or should it simply stop and report the list of missing substitutes
> > (after which the user could use --do-not-upgrade)
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> BTW, should --only-substitutes filter out packages without a substitute,
> or should it simply stop and report the list of missing substitutes
> (after which the user could use --do-not-upgrade)?
In my opinion “--only-substitutes” should stop and report a list.
If it c
Hello Timothy,
Timothy Sample skribis:
> I’ve been using GuixSD for a couple of months now, and it is super
> cool. Thanks for all your hard work! There is one little thing,
> though. :)
If it’s just this one thing, that’s okay. ;-)
> Ludo suggested to check each package using the “substitute
Hi Guix,
I’ve been using GuixSD for a couple of months now, and it is super
cool. Thanks for all your hard work! There is one little thing,
though. :)
There’s a feature request (bug #26608) about adding an
“--only-substitutes” flag to “guix package -u”, which would only upgrade
packages that have
10 matches
Mail list logo
