Hi,
> Yes. There are some packages where this change was not trivial, though.
do you have examples? Maybe we have to improve pyproject-build-system?
Lars
"jgart" writes:
> Is our goal still to eventually move all python packages to
> pyproject-build-system and zap the python-build-system?
Yes. There are some packages where this change was not trivial, though.
--
Ricardo
Hi,
I like the idea of audio/video confs for the Python team.
My availability is limited these days but I can participate in an hour
discussion if we can coordinate it around my work schedule and if the branches
can be kept small and topic-oriented in order to not let them go
stale/long-lived.
Hello,
Sharlatan Hellseher skribis:
> I would like to open a conversation on upgrading NumPy, Pandas, Numba
> and SciPY.
Cc’ing members of the Python team, to make sure the right people are in
the loop.
> It would be reasonable to refresh that core scientific packages for
> Python after mergin
Hi Guix!
I would like to open a conversation on upgrading NumPy, Pandas, Numba
and SciPY.
It would be reasonable to refresh that core scientific packages for
Python after merging python-team which is nearly finished building.
Stats:
- branch :: master
- repository URL :: https://git.savannah.gn
