Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Definitely. Another application I’ve always wanted is a least-authority
> shell, like Plash [0].
>
> (Speaking of which, I just found Shill [1], which seems similar to Plash
> and even has a to-do item regarding package management [2] and is
> written in Racket; unfortun
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>>>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> On Fr
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> "Thomps
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>>>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> Yeah
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> Yeah, our daemon would do the same thing. We could maybe even have a
>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>>>
Yeah, our daemon would do the same thing. We could maybe even have a
little Guile library that allows
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>>
>>> Yeah, our daemon would do the same thing. We could maybe even have a
>>> little Guile library that allows one to evaluate arbitrary scheme code
>>> from within the contain
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>>> Until there’s a daemon to keep track of containers, “guix system
>>> container” could return the PID of the container’s PID1, to make it
>>> ea
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> Yeah, our daemon would do the same thing. We could maybe even have a
>> little Guile library that allows one to evaluate arbitrary scheme code
>> from within the container. :)
>
> Actually, something quite
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> Yeah, our daemon would do the same thing. We could maybe even have a
> little Guile library that allows one to evaluate arbitrary scheme code
> from within the container. :)
Actually, something quite easily feasible would be this:
(eval-in-container #~(system* #$
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> I tried adding this dummy service:
>>
>> (define (bash-service)
>> (with-monad %store-monad
>> (return (service
>>(documentation "Run Bash from PID 1.")
>>(p
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> I'd like to give a quick update on the state of wip-container branch.
>> As of this morning, one can run the below commands and have a somewhat
>> functional GuixSD container:
>>
>> # Hardcoded /tmp/contain
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> I'd like to give a quick update on the state of wip-container branch.
> As of this morning, one can run the below commands and have a somewhat
> functional GuixSD container:
>
> # Hardcoded /tmp/container as the container root directory until I
> # add a command l
Hey folks,
I'd like to give a quick update on the state of wip-container branch.
As of this morning, one can run the below commands and have a somewhat
functional GuixSD container:
# Hardcoded /tmp/container as the container root directory until I
# add a command line switch.
mkdir /tmp/con
14 matches
Mail list logo
