Re: Replace Icedove for Thunderbird

2024-11-05 Thread Ian Eure
Hi Felix, Sergio, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: Hi Sergio, On Sun, Nov 03 2024, Sergio Pastor Pérez wrote: The Debian wiki says that the trademark issues with Thunderbird have been resolved: As far as I know, t

Re: Replace Icedove for Thunderbird

2024-11-04 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Sergio, On Sun, Nov 03 2024, Sergio Pastor Pérez wrote: > The Debian wiki says that the trademark issues with Thunderbird have > been resolved: As far as I know, the Mozilla Foundation simply accepted the Debian builds as official. I am not sure the same is true for GNU Guix.

Re: Replace Icedove for Thunderbird

2024-11-04 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Sergio, On Sun, Nov 03 2024, Sergio Pastor Pérez wrote: > The Debian wiki says that the trademark issues with Thunderbird have > been resolved: As far as I know, the Mozilla Foundation simply accepted the Debian builds as official. I am not sure the same is true for GNU Guix.

Replace Icedove for Thunderbird

2024-11-03 Thread Sergio Pastor Pérez
Hello. Is it possible to have Thunderbird packaged in Guix? If so, why are we still using Icedove? The Debian wiki says that the trademark issues with Thunderbird have been resolved: https://wiki.debian.org/Thunderbird Regards, Sergio

Addons (esp. pEp) for Icecat/THunderbird

2021-05-04 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Hello, pEp just publishes a beta-version of pEp for Thunderbird. Since guix already provides the required base-packages (sequoia, pEp-engiine) it would be great if we could provide the icecat/thunderbird-addon, too. Anybody to support my on packaging the add-on? Or the other way round

Re: [ICEDOVE]: Critical Information for Thunderbird 78

2020-06-28 Thread Raghav Gururajan
Hi Jonathan! > Thanks for this head up. Version 78 should be released somewhere in July > according to https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Home#Latest_release > > We have to see when Thunderbird 78.0.0 comes out if it have security > updates. Then we have to update it and people

Re: [ICEDOVE]: Critical Information for Thunderbird 78

2020-06-28 Thread Jonathan Brielmaier
On 28.06.20 01:24, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > Hello Guix! > > I just got the following pop-up on icedove and wanted to inform you all. > > *** START *** > > Critical Information for Thunderbird 78 > > If you depend on the security of OpenPGP messages for important >

[ICEDOVE]: Critical Information for Thunderbird 78

2020-06-27 Thread Raghav Gururajan
Hello Guix! I just got the following pop-up on icedove and wanted to inform you all. *** START *** Critical Information for Thunderbird 78 If you depend on the security of OpenPGP messages for important purposes, then please do NOT manually upgrade to Thunderbird 78.0. Instead, wait until you

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-06 Thread Mark H Weaver
(cpe-name . "firefox_esr") (cpe-version . ,(first (string-split version #\-))) + +(define-public icedove + (package +(name "icedove") +(version "52.7.0") +(source (origin + (method url-fetch) + (uri (string-

WIP-packages (Was: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove)

2018-04-04 Thread Björn Höfling
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 10:34:10 +0200 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Maybe one of you can post the current patch to guix-patches and people > can then work from there? (There’s already a few WIP patches at > https://bugs.gnu.org/guix-patches and I think it’s a fine way to let > people know

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-04 Thread Björn Höfling
On Wed, 04 Apr 2018 01:14:53 -0400 Mark H Weaver wrote: > No promises, but I'll try to find time in the next few days to make an > attempt at an Icedove package. As de-facto maintainer of the IceCat > package in Guix, I suppose that I'm well-positioned to work on this, > and I certainly agree th

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-04 Thread Nils Gillmann
nore the AGPL3 header, it's my default and for what I > >> upstream I relicense. > >> > >> This is Thunderbird 52.6.0, I fear that version newer than 54.x will > >> have the same problem I'm debugging in newer Firefox now with > >> mandatory rust.

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Björn Höfling skribis: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 20:02:23 + > Nils Gillmann wrote: > >> The patches would apply nowhere then, I'm sending a tarball of the >> work. You can ignore the AGPL3 header, it's my default and for what I >> upstream I relicen

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Björn, Björn Höfling writes: > One of my key customers needs a new GNU/Linux installation and they are > willing to give GuixSD a try if Thunderbird is available. > > I thought that's no problem and was surprised to not find anything > like Icedove in the guix repository.

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Björn Höfling
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 20:02:23 + Nils Gillmann wrote: > The patches would apply nowhere then, I'm sending a tarball of the > work. You can ignore the AGPL3 header, it's my default and for what I > upstream I relicense. > > This is Thunderbird 52.6.0, I fear that ver

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Nils Gillmann
Mark H Weaver transcribed 751 bytes: > Nils Gillmann writes: > > > Mark H Weaver transcribed 1.3K bytes: > >> Did someone tell you that you shouldn't post a preliminary > >> Thunderbird/Icedove package definition to this mailing list? > > > > No.

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Mark H Weaver
Nils Gillmann writes: > Mark H Weaver transcribed 1.3K bytes: >> Did someone tell you that you shouldn't post a preliminary >> Thunderbird/Icedove package definition to this mailing list? > > No. It just exists in a branch in an (experimental, fluid) repository wher

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Nils Gillmann
Mark H Weaver transcribed 1.3K bytes: > Hi Nils, > > Nils Gillmann writes: > > > Björn Höfling transcribed 1.2K bytes: > > > >> Are there any more recent news on the Thunderbird side? Does anyone have > >> more-or-less ready snippets available? > >

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Nils, Nils Gillmann writes: > Björn Höfling transcribed 1.2K bytes: > >> Are there any more recent news on the Thunderbird side? Does anyone have >> more-or-less ready snippets available? > > I can not post the link to straight-out of the box Thunderbird here > (cu

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Nils Gillmann
Björn Höfling transcribed 1.2K bytes: > One of my key customers needs a new GNU/Linux installation and they are > willing to give GuixSD a try if Thunderbird is available. > > I thought that's no problem and was surprised to not find anything > like Icedove in the guix repo

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Nils Gillmann
.org/Apps/Evolution I'm confused. Are you asking about Evolution (the mailinglist should have an older thread where I posted an initial receipe) or Thunderbird/Icedove? As far as I know no one else is working on Thunderbird for now except for me. Current part where I'm struck for some time now

Re: Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Rene
Hello, GNOME Evolution is another graphical mail-reader; currently it is not packaged, but the important part is that it requires the evolution-data-server service that does not exist either. See more: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution

Looking for Thunderbird/Icedove

2018-04-03 Thread Björn Höfling
One of my key customers needs a new GNU/Linux installation and they are willing to give GuixSD a try if Thunderbird is available. I thought that's no problem and was surprised to not find anything like Icedove in the guix repository. I found two references on the net, but both are neg

Re: Thunderbird

2017-09-11 Thread Arun Isaac
> Perhaps, claws-mail or blasa are better alternatives. Both >> claws-mail and balsa are already packaged for Guix. >> > I didn t know I'm not saying we shouldn't package astroid mail. Just making an observation... > In my view, those make the Thunderbird case ev

Re: Thunderbird

2017-09-11 Thread ng0
Catonano transcribed 6.1K bytes: > 2017-09-11 12:31 GMT+02:00 ng0 : > > > Arun Isaac transcribed 0.4K bytes: > > > > > > > I was wondering if anyone would work on Astroid mail > > > > https://astroidmail.github.io/ > > > > > > &

Re: Thunderbird

2017-09-11 Thread Catonano
2017-09-11 12:31 GMT+02:00 ng0 : > Arun Isaac transcribed 0.4K bytes: > > > > > I was wondering if anyone would work on Astroid mail > > > https://astroidmail.github.io/ > > > > > > It seems simpler to package than Thunderbird and it could be ex

Re: Thunderbird

2017-09-11 Thread ng0
Arun Isaac transcribed 0.4K bytes: > > > I was wondering if anyone would work on Astroid mail > > https://astroidmail.github.io/ > > > > It seems simpler to package than Thunderbird and it could be extremely > > useful in the short/medium term > > Astroid

Re: Thunderbird

2017-09-11 Thread Catonano
2017-09-11 8:23 GMT+02:00 Arun Isaac : > > > I was wondering if anyone would work on Astroid mail > > https://astroidmail.github.io/ > > > > It seems simpler to package than Thunderbird and it could be extremely > > useful in the short/medium term > > Astro

Re: Thunderbird

2017-09-10 Thread Arun Isaac
> I was wondering if anyone would work on Astroid mail > https://astroidmail.github.io/ > > It seems simpler to package than Thunderbird and it could be extremely > useful in the short/medium term Astroid requires external programs like mpop or offlineimap to fetch mail. So

Re: Thunderbird

2017-09-08 Thread Catonano
also > manually through GNU Guix. > > I was wondering if anyone would work on Astroid mail https://astroidmail.github.io/ It seems simpler to package than Thunderbird and it could be extremely useful in the short/medium term

Re: Thunderbird

2017-09-06 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
I see... Perhaps the extensions page can be redirected to the related page on the Free Software Directory, or completely disable the extensions page redirect and allow only packages to be installed either manually or also manually through GNU Guix. ng0 writes: > Hi, > > > Which major issues? I

Re: Thunderbird/Icedove

2017-08-26 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 26.08.2017 um 10:00 schrieb ng0: > Does someone of you use Thunderbird and have a desire to get it working? I tried building thunderbird for guix about a year ago – and gave up. I took the firefox build as a blueprint and tried adopting it with success. I then decided that somebody knowing

Thunderbird/Icedove

2017-08-26 Thread ng0
Does someone of you use Thunderbird and have a desire to get it working? The state of my thunderbird is a basic construction site. I'm running into issues which are sometimes one or almost two decades old which were "supposedly" resolved. All in all it is easy, if it wouldn&#x

Re: Thunderbird

2017-07-28 Thread ng0
d substitutions than necessary. ng0 transcribed 2.5K bytes: > Hi, > > Adonay Felipe Nogueira transcribed 1.2K bytes: > > The existence of Icedove and absense of Thunderbird in the following > > places tell me that the major issues aren't solved yet: > > > >

Re: Thunderbird

2017-07-28 Thread ng0
Hi, Adonay Felipe Nogueira transcribed 1.2K bytes: > The existence of Icedove and absense of Thunderbird in the following > places tell me that the major issues aren't solved yet: > > - [[https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=thunderbird]]. > > - > [[https://devel.tris

Re: Thunderbird

2017-07-28 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
The existence of Icedove and absense of Thunderbird in the following places tell me that the major issues aren't solved yet: - [[https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?q=thunderbird]]. - [[https://devel.trisquel.info/trisquel/package-helpers/tree/flidas]]. Flidas is the codename of the upc

Thunderbird

2017-07-18 Thread ng0
Hi, I am currently working on Thunderbird. While the trademark issues between Debian and Mozilla have been resolved (and Icedove is no longer a thing) I guess this isn't enough for Guix. I'm developing a vanilla build first, but I'm open for suggestions on what's ne