Hi,
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> so I've downloaded approximately 6 GB of texlive today and it always fails at
> the verification of the hash value:
>
> Starting download of
> /gnu/store/xdjl5wxdjghq85nbc9qacgyzh8d54f6y-texlive-20160523b-texmf.tar.xz
> From
> ftp://tug.org/historic/systems/
Hi,
so I've downloaded approximately 6 GB of texlive today and it always fails at
the verification of the hash value:
Starting download of
/gnu/store/xdjl5wxdjghq85nbc9qacgyzh8d54f6y-texlive-20160523b-texmf.tar.xz
From
ftp://tug.org/historic/systems/texlive/2016/texlive-20160523b-texmf.tar.xz.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>>
>>>> * gnu/packages/tex.scm (texlive-texmf-minimal)[arguments]: Move contents
>>>> of "prune" build phase..
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>
>>> * gnu/packages/tex.scm (texlive-texmf-minimal)[arguments]: Move contents
>>> of "prune" build phase...
>>> [source]: ...to a snippet here.
>>
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> * gnu/packages/tex.scm (texlive-texmf-minimal)[arguments]: Move contents
>> of "prune" build phase...
>> [source]: ...to a snippet here.
>
> It looks nicer this way, but a possible downside is the
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> * gnu/packages/tex.scm (texlive-texmf-minimal)[arguments]: Move contents
> of "prune" build phase...
> [source]: ...to a snippet here.
It looks nicer this way, but a possible downside is the extra derivation
and recompression of the patched source.
* gnu/packages/tex.scm (texlive-texmf-minimal)[arguments]: Move contents
of "prune" build phase...
[source]: ...to a snippet here.
---
gnu/packages/tex.scm | 86 +---
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gn
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:42:34AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > We don't serve substitutes of texlive-texmf. We achieve this by
>> > configuring nginx to return "410 Gone&quo
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:21:21AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I don't know. Among the packages based on this is libreoffice, which I'm
> guessing many people who would use it would never install it if they
> always needed to build it from source. Based on the notes in maths.scm on
> openblas,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:42:34AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > We don't serve substitutes of texlive-texmf. We achieve this by
> > configuring nginx to return "410 Gone" [0].
> >
> > This requires users t
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:42:34AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > We don't serve substitutes of texlive-texmf. We achieve this by
>> > configuring nginx to return "410 Gone&quo
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:42:34AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > We don't serve substitutes of texlive-texmf. We achieve this by
> > configuring nginx to return "410 Gone" [0].
> >
> > This requires users t
Leo Famulari writes:
> We don't serve substitutes of texlive-texmf. We achieve this by
> configuring nginx to return "410 Gone" [0].
>
> This requires users to build it with '--fallback', and the Guix error
> message even recommends this, but many u
We don't serve substitutes of texlive-texmf. We achieve this by
configuring nginx to return "410 Gone" [0].
This requires users to build it with '--fallback', and the Guix error
message even recommends this, but many users ask about it on IRC.
I think we should mark it
On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:04:14 +0100
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Eric Bavier skribis:
>
> > On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:41:44 +0100
> > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> >
> >> Andreas Enge skribis:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Eric Bavier skribis:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:41:44 +0100
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Andreas Enge skribis:
>>
>> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> >> Andreas Enge skribis:
>> >> > This was the original reason (plus easier debugging) tha
On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:41:44 +0100
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> Andreas Enge skribis:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Andreas Enge skribis:
> >> > This was the original reason (plus easier debugging) that I kept the
> >> > internal pack
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 05:41:44PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Second, there is gettext with a native input texlive-bin.
> No, fortunately not! :-)
My bad! I was mixing it up with po4a in the gettext module.
It requires texlive for its tests; if we were to take texlive out, we would
need to
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Andreas Enge skribis:
>> > This was the original reason (plus easier debugging) that I kept the
>> > internal packages -bin and -texmf public; I think it was a mistake,
>> > since it seems to lead to a lo
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Andreas Enge skribis:
> > This was the original reason (plus easier debugging) that I kept the
> > internal packages -bin and -texmf public; I think it was a mistake,
> > since it seems to lead to a lot of confusion.
> > So I will
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:34:23AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> We don’t want people to have to do that, do we? :-)
>> Personally, I don’t want to have to think beyond “guix package -i
>> texlive”.
>
> It is only about choice, you can always just install texlive if yo
it was a mistake, since it
seems to lead to a lot of confusion.
So I will hide both the internal packages one of these days.
Users are advised to not install either texlive-bin or texlive-texmf into
their profile; they will not work correctly together. Either install texlive
to get the full exper
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:20:33AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Or simply:
>> guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages texlive) texlive-texmf)'
>
> That is nifty! I suppose this also uses substitutes if present?
Yes, of course.
> In t
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:20:33AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Or simply:
> guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages texlive) texlive-texmf)'
That is nifty! I suppose this also uses substitutes if present? In that case,
we could even make the texlive-bin package private as well,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:07:23PM -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> I install texlive-texmf into my profile because otherwise latex cannot
> find any extensions. In particular, I was trying to compile a beamer
> document and I spent hours wrestling with load paths and nothing
>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to make the texlive-texmf package private, to avoid that people
> erroneously install it into their profiles. One could still build the big
> data part locally as follows:
>
> guix build texlive
Andreas Enge skribis:
> I would like to make the texlive-texmf package private, to avoid that people
> erroneously install it into their profiles. One could still build the big
> data part locally as follows:
>
> guix build texlive-bin # This will use substitutes.
> guix buil
Hello,
I would like to make the texlive-texmf package private, to avoid that people
erroneously install it into their profiles. One could still build the big
data part locally as follows:
guix build texlive-bin # This will use substitutes.
guix build --no-substitutes texlive
# This will build
28 matches
Mail list logo
