Hi all,
Bit late here, but as a StumpWM user (and having a module I adopted from
someone, but maintained outside of the official contrib repo) thought I would
chime in. Though in my personal config right now I use a local checkout of the
stumpwm-contrib repo rather than the Guix packages. I thi
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 09:32:35 -0700 Trev wrote:
> I'm not sure they'd work, either, but pinning my packages in my own
> channel, or even just writing a package definition on my own load path
> pins the package well enough for me. I also won't have to remember that
> CLI command.
That makes sense
jgart writes:
>> If I run into personal issues with the current pattern, I can always
>> just "fork" a module into my own channel, after all.
>
> Have you tried to use package transformations? Maybe they will work here...
>
>
> Here's how I got the latest eglot, for example:
>
> guix upgrade emac
> If I run into personal issues with the current pattern, I can always
> just "fork" a module into my own channel, after all.
Have you tried to use package transformations? Maybe they will work here...
Here's how I got the latest eglot, for example:
guix upgrade emacs-eglot
--with-git-url=emac
On 11-09-2022 17:02, Trev wrote:
Hey Guix,
I am trying to decide whether or not to contribute a refactor of
stumpwm-contrib in gnu/packages/wm.scm. It feels like each contrib
module should be its own package with its own checkout and that it might
be a bad idea to update all of the contrib mod
Trev writes:
> Hey Guix,
>
> I am trying to decide whether or not to contribute a refactor of
> stumpwm-contrib in gnu/packages/wm.scm. It feels like each contrib
> module should be its own package with its own checkout and that it might
> be a bad idea to update all of the contrib modules throug
Hey Guix,
I am trying to decide whether or not to contribute a refactor of
stumpwm-contrib in gnu/packages/wm.scm. It feels like each contrib
module should be its own package with its own checkout and that it might
be a bad idea to update all of the contrib modules through one common
ancestor.
