taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> I actually agree. Well, next round?
>
> If you want. :-) I thought it might be too much to have a second commit
> that touches all recipes where 'modify-phases' is used, but maybe I'm
>
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I actually agree. Well, next round?
If you want. :-) I thought it might be too much to have a second commit
that touches all recipes where 'modify-phases' is used, but maybe I'm
being too pedantic.
> In think Guile 2.1 is standards-compliant in that resp
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> I’ve applied it locally and will push shortly.
>
> It might be too late, but I have a nitpick on my macro: the implicit
> quoting of phase names 1. makes it impossible to provide them
>
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I’ve applied it locally and will push shortly.
It might be too late, but I have a nitpick on my macro: the implicit
quoting of phase names 1. makes it impossible to provide them
dynamically (e.g. procedure argument), 2. might give an illusion that
they're
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
>
>> (modify-phases '((foo . 0) (bar . 1) (baz . 2))
>> (delete foo)
>> (replace bar 'x)
>> (add-before baz pre-baz 'y)) ;=> ((bar . x) (pre-baz . y) (baz . 2))
>
> I like it! Let’s pu
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> (modify-phases '((foo . 0) (bar . 1) (baz . 2))
> (delete foo)
> (replace bar 'x)
> (add-before baz pre-baz 'y)) ;=> ((bar . x) (pre-baz . y) (baz . 2))
I like it! Let’s put it in (guix utils)?
> ;;; phase-lambda
>
> (def
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 05:42:23PM +0100, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote:
>> (delete foo)
>> (replace bar 'x)
>> (add-before baz pre-baz 'y)) ;=> ((bar . x) (pre-baz . y) (baz . 2))
>> This has the following advantages:
>> - The or
"Thompson, David" writes:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Thompson, David
> wrote:
>
>> I understand the temptation to name it 'modify-phases', but since this
>> macro applies to any alist, I think 'modify-alist' or something with
>> "alist" in the name would be more appropriate.
>
> Looking
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Thompson, David
wrote:
> I understand the temptation to name it 'modify-phases', but since this
> macro applies to any alist, I think 'modify-alist' or something with
> "alist" in the name would be more appropriate.
Looking again, I see that the above isn't quit
