Thanks for the comments!
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:45:01AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> This comment is too indented and redundant with the code below, I think.
Okay, I kept a shorter and clearer comment.
> Make it an inner ‘define’, to reduce indentation.
Done.
> Also the docstring should
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:20:42AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> This is a bit verbose. I think it would be nice to have a data
>> structure to describe what we are deleting, along these lines
>> (untested):
>
> I agree, computer science 101 tells us to use a function
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:20:42AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> This is a bit verbose. I think it would be nice to have a data
> structure to describe what we are deleting, along these lines
> (untested):
I agree, computer science 101 tells us to use a function when repeating the
same sequence
Andreas Enge skribis:
> the first attached patch adds a small texlive variant. I spent quite some
> time determining things to delete from texlive-texmf so that the result
> would still be usable, but I am certain the result is not minimal in the
> strict sense of the word. So I wond
Hello,
the first attached patch adds a small texlive variant. I spent quite some
time determining things to delete from texlive-texmf so that the result
would still be usable, but I am certain the result is not minimal in the
strict sense of the word. So I wondered whether the package should not
