David Thompson writes:
> 宋文武 writes:
>
>> +1 for return 'manifest', in a same way as 'operating-system'.
>> And how about use specification instead of package, so I can:
>>
>> (manifest
>> (map package-specification->manifest-entry
>> '("emacs"
>>"font-adobe-source-han
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> David Thompson skribis:
>
>> Below is a new patch set taking into account the feedback received thus
>> far. The (guix profiles) module still needs to be documented in the
>> manual, but there's quite a lot of procedures and variables to account
>> for. Would anyone b
David Thompson skribis:
> Below is a new patch set taking into account the feedback received thus
> far. The (guix profiles) module still needs to be documented in the
> manual, but there's quite a lot of procedures and variables to account
> for. Would anyone be intertested in helping with thi
Below is a new patch set taking into account the feedback received thus
far. The (guix profiles) module still needs to be documented in the
manual, but there's quite a lot of procedures and variables to account
for. Would anyone be intertested in helping with this part?
>From d506ad1d8824cc69436
David Thompson skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> We’ll need documentation and tests, too. :-)
>
> Regarding tests, where should I add them? I can see that
> tests/guix-package.sh uses the '-n' flag to avoid building things.
> Simply running 'guix package -n --apply=test-manifest.scm' and
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> We’ll need documentation and tests, too. :-)
Regarding tests, where should I add them? I can see that
tests/guix-package.sh uses the '-n' flag to avoid building things.
Simply running 'guix package -n --apply=test-manifest.scm' and getting a
0 exit value would suffice
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> (FWIW I’m not fond of the `(,gcc-toolchain "debug") notation that we
> also use in packages, but it has the advantage of being concise.)
Do you have plans to introduce a better notation? G-exps?
--
David Thompson
GPG Key: 0FF1D807
David Thompson skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> What about instead requiring people to return a manifest:
>>
>> (use-modules (guix profiles))
>> (use-package-modules base emacs guile)
>>
>> (manifest (cons (package->manifest-entry gcc-toolchain "debug")
>> (m
宋文武 writes:
> +1 for return 'manifest', in a same way as 'operating-system'.
> And how about use specification instead of package, so I can:
>
> (manifest
> (map package-specification->manifest-entry
> '("emacs"
>"font-adobe-source-han-sans:cn")))
I don't like that ide
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> David Thompson skribis:
>
>> Lately I've been wanting to version control the list of packages that I
>> install in my user profile so that I can sync it amongst many machines.
>> So, I took a stab at adding a new '--apply' option to 'guix package'
>> that reads in a pac
宋文武 skribis:
> And how about use specification instead of package, so I can:
>
> (manifest
> (map package-specification->manifest-entry
> '("emacs"
>"font-adobe-source-han-sans:cn")))
Sure, with:
(use-modules (gnu) (guix profiles))
(define package-specification->
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> David Thompson skribis:
>
>> Lately I've been wanting to version control the list of packages that I
>> install in my user profile so that I can sync it amongst many machines.
>> So, I took a stab at adding a new '--apply' option to 'guix package'
>> that reads in a pac
David Thompson skribis:
> Lately I've been wanting to version control the list of packages that I
> install in my user profile so that I can sync it amongst many machines.
> So, I took a stab at adding a new '--apply' option to 'guix package'
> that reads in a package list from a Scheme file and
Hey folks,
Lately I've been wanting to version control the list of packages that I
install in my user profile so that I can sync it amongst many machines.
So, I took a stab at adding a new '--apply' option to 'guix package'
that reads in a package list from a Scheme file and creates a new
generati
14 matches
Mail list logo
