Hello,
indieterminacy writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 2024-12-05 07:13, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Hi Tomas,
>> ...
>> I agree it's a bit tedious, both manually and also in diffs. My
>> personal preference is to leave just one space between the field name
>> and the value, that also holds for variable b
Hello,
On 2024-12-05 07:13, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Hi Tomas,
...
I agree it's a bit tedious, both manually and also in diffs. My
personal preference is to leave just one space between the field name
and the value, that also holds for variable bounds in lets, etc., to
avoid the problem (at the
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 01:34:29AM +0100, Tomas Volf wrote:
>
> Hello Guix,
>
> I would like to bring up for debate the convention the project has of
> vertically aligning the record definitions. While I agree it lead to
> visually pleasing code, I also leads to significantly bloated diffs.
>
>
Hi Tomas,
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:
> Hello Guix,
>
> I would like to bring up for debate the convention the project has of
> vertically aligning the record definitions.
I don't think that's a project convention. It's more like it's a
convention of some individual in the projects :-).
Hello Guix,
I would like to bring up for debate the convention the project has of
vertically aligning the record definitions. While I agree it lead to
visually pleasing code, I also leads to significantly bloated diffs.
While some amount of noise in diffs is expected in any lisp language
(the t
