Hello,
Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 11:33:54AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 11:16:14AM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> > With that in mind, ‘core-updates’ would effectively become the branch of
> > the ‘core-packages’ team: the branch where we update packages in these
> > file
Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 11:16:14AM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> With that in mind, ‘core-updates’ would effectively become the branch of
> the ‘core-packages’ team: the branch where we update packages in these
> files (primarily the toolchain and Guile), perhaps also (guix build
> utils), and t
Hi!
Andreas Enge skribis:
> When we started implementing the teams idea, I thought we would get rid
> of the core-updates branch altogether. I still think it should not exist
> as such, but be folded into the teams workflow. I am still mildly worried
> that we have this branch into which many un
Am Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 10:53:46PM -0800 schrieb Andy Tai:
> Hi, hope Guix maintainers can clarify the role of the now core-updates
> branch; the current documentation does not specify the core-updates
> branch as a thing but there are clearly interests and uses of this
> branch for package updates
Hi Leo,
On Mon, Nov 27 2023, Leo Famulari wrote:
> The core-updates branch was / is for updating core packages, which are listed
> here:
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/ci.scm?h=v1.4.0#n136
I was surprised to see guile-3.0 there. Should it read guile-3.0/pinned
instead?
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023, at 01:53, Andy Tai wrote:
> Hi, hope Guix maintainers can clarify the role of the now core-updates
> branch; the current documentation does not specify the core-updates
> branch as a thing but there are clearly interests and uses of this
> branch for package updates not belong
