Christopher Allan Webber skribis:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:42, Hartmut Goebel
>> writes:
>>
>>> Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo:
5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’
>>>
>>> Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be
>>> common to native
Hello!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> Here is part of the documentation in that branch:
>
> 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’
>
Excellent, nicely written as usual!
> With the release of Guile 2.2.2, I have re-enabled
> https://guix-potluck.org. I also refactored that server
Greets,
Just a quick yes-and note:
On Tue 02 May 2017 04:26, Katherine Cox-Buday
writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>> & as for dev/testing/prod/etc -- I have no idea :) I'm not really an
>> ops person, so I can only speculate, and anyone can do that as well as I
>> can :) I think with guix-potlu
Andy Wingo writes:
> I guess you would probably also want to to specify also a set of
> active channels for a given guix command; e.g. "guix package
> --channels=testing --install my-package".
Being able to work with packages at the level of granularity of channels
would be ah-mazing. So many po
Le Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:46:43 -0500,
Christopher Allan Webber a écrit :
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
> > On Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:42, Hartmut Goebel
> > writes:
> >
> >> Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo:
> >>> 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’
> >>
> >> Please think about an other name for t
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:42, Hartmut Goebel
> writes:
>
>> Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo:
>>> 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’
>>
>> Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be
>> common to native speakers but I never heard this word. Thanks.
Hi :)
On Fri 28 Apr 2017 15:41, Katherine Cox-Buday
writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> With that I think I'd like to move to a "use" phase where I just sit
>> back and see how people use the thing :) WDYT?
>
> I am very excited about this functionality for all of the reasons you
> enumerated.
I am personally happy with potluck, however collab has a similar group feeling
to it.
-H
Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 28 Apr 2017,
14:46, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: I don't hold any strong opinions on the name,
but in the interest of ideas: - guix quorum -
I don't hold any strong opinions on the name, but in the interest of
ideas:
- guix quorum
- guix collab
- guix confer
- guix conjoin
That's all I have for now :)
--
Katherine
Andy Wingo writes:
> With that I think I'd like to move to a "use" phase where I just sit
> back and see how people use the thing :) WDYT?
I am very excited about this functionality for all of the reasons you
enumerated. I don't have any time at the moment, but I was (and still
am) interested i
In the UK,
We do potluck dinners, I also had one in Canada.
Though I agree it's quite colloquial term, does one have to understand the
reference to understand how to use the command on the CLI?
-H
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On 28 Apr 2017, 13:58, Jan Nieuwen
Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be
> common to native speakers but I never heard this word. Thanks.
Potluck dish --even though it's English--- is a common word even in the
Netherlands...possibly this is a European thing.
I like the name,
On Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:42, Hartmut Goebel writes:
> Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo:
>> 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’
>
> Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be
> common to native speakers but I never heard this word. Thanks.
I thought about many things :)
Hi,
Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo:
> 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’
Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be
common to native speakers but I never heard this word. Thanks.
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
