2017-07-24 17:39 GMT+02:00 Ricardo Wurmus :
>
> Catonano writes:
>
> >> I am currently working on a guile version of what Sander did for Nix for
> >> importing entire npm dependency trees, but this will likely lead to
> lots of
> >> programmatically
> >> defined packages instead of the guix appro
Catonano writes:
>> I am currently working on a guile version of what Sander did for Nix for
>> importing entire npm dependency trees, but this will likely lead to lots of
>> programmatically
>> defined packages instead of the guix approach of mostly-manually defining
>> each package.
>>
>
> Wha
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:45:29 +0200, Catonano wrote:
> in my idea I would have build a database withh conditions for being non
> free forr every npm package.
>
> So we could have queried the database for questions like: is there any non
> free or non buildable package in the dependency tree of,
Mike,
2017-07-15 5:34 GMT+02:00 Mike Gerwitz :
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 13:57:30 +0200, Jelle Licht wrote:
> > Regardless, the biggest issue that remains is still that npm-land is
> mired
> > in cyclical dependencies and a fun-but-not-actually unique dependency
> > resolving scheme.
>
> I still
2017-07-14 19:11 GMT+02:00 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
> Catonano writes:
>
> > I read that Jelle and Jan used their own branch in order to have npm
> > based software to be installed in their GuixSD environments, as binary
> > blobs
>
> Jelle wrote a nice and clean npm importer, no binary anything.
>
> N
2017-07-14 13:57 GMT+02:00 Jelle Licht :
> Hi Catonano,
>
> I would be be happy to help you with this, but tbh, I am not comfortable
> discussing this in-depth on guix-devel, as this seems antithetical to Guix'
> goals.
>
Ok, at least we made this clear.
I'll keep the list off the hook, should I
Note that it's not required to include license notices (not to be
confused with the license itself) in the header (or as metadata) of each
source file. It's a recommendation, such that if someone gets only that
specific file, then that person can easily know and have proof that such
file is under t
Hm... If this is indeed true, then it's indeed a concern.
I wonder if we can check that out...
--
- [[https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno]]
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre, por isso não uso. Iguais a ele prefiro
2017-07-15 5:34 GMT+02:00 Mike Gerwitz :
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 13:57:30 +0200, Jelle Licht wrote:
> > Regardless, the biggest issue that remains is still that npm-land is
> mired
> > in cyclical dependencies and a fun-but-not-actually unique dependency
> > resolving scheme.
>
> I still think t
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 13:57:30 +0200, Jelle Licht wrote:
> Regardless, the biggest issue that remains is still that npm-land is mired
> in cyclical dependencies and a fun-but-not-actually unique dependency
> resolving scheme.
I still think the largest issue is trying to determine if a given
pack
Catonano writes:
> I read that Jelle and Jan used their own branch in order to have npm
> based software to be installed in their GuixSD environments, as binary
> blobs
Jelle wrote a nice and clean npm importer, no binary anything.
Npm packages have the can be source or binary. Depending on how
Hi Catonano,
I would be be happy to help you with this, but tbh, I am not comfortable
discussing this in-depth on guix-devel, as this seems antithetical to Guix'
goals.
All I will say here is that you need to adapt the npm importer to use the
sources from the npm registry instead of resolving to a
12 matches
Mail list logo
