Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

Hi, On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 11:07 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > > John Kehayias writes: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Update below: >> >> On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:47 PM, John Kehayias wrote: >> [snippy snip snip] >> >> At this point I feel we are just about ready to go, unless there are >> objecti

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

John Kehayias writes: > Hi everyone, > > Update below: > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:47 PM, John Kehayias wrote: > [snippy snip snip] >>> >>> Happy to! Substitutes will eventually become available, but there's >>> quite a few builds to be done. This takes care of some ungrafts and >>> updates w

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

Hi everyone, Update below: On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:47 PM, John Kehayias wrote: [snippy snip snip] >> >> Happy to! Substitutes will eventually become available, but there's >> quite a few builds to be done. This takes care of some ungrafts and >> updates with I hope minimal disruption. I'll be

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

Hi, I've just submitted a pair of patches for the mesa-updates branch: updating xorgproto and xorg-server-xwayland. The xorgproto is a high-impact update (guix refresh reports rebuilding 8710 packages would ensure 22871 dependent packages are rebuilt), but r

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

> Details of changes below, which included some more ungrafting: > >>> Here is a list of what has been on my radar and I'll be looking to >>> apply on the mesa-updates branch. If there's something I missed and >>> you think makes sense here (e.g. lower level graphical/X related >>> libraries) pleas

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

Hi Maxim and guix-devel, On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 09:27 AM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi John, > > John Kehayias writes: > [...] > > If you're going to put a branch for it and build it whole, I'd simply > merge it whole after it's done building and hasn't regressed on package > failures or other t

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

Hi John, John Kehayias writes: > Hi Guix-ers, > > Time for another round of Mesa and friends updates! I've been waiting > for another Mesa release but seems the 23.2 series has stalled out and > now is a good time before 23.3 or 24. I've been using 23.2.1 for some > packages locally without issu