On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> However, the first one is internally assigned to the variable "libwnck-1".
> I assume that someone got inspired by another case where the "-1" is actually
> a version number. Is it okay if I rename it to "libwnck-2"?
Done in commit db
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:17:41 +0100
Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:06:18PM +0100, Fabian Harfert wrote:
> > the name libwnck-1 is right. The library files have this name and
> > the pkg-config file refers to that. This is because it uses Gtk+
> > 2.x and has a different API than
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 04:06:18PM +0100, Fabian Harfert wrote:
> the name libwnck-1 is right. The library files have this name and the
> pkg-config file refers to that. This is because it uses Gtk+ 2.x and
> has a different API than libwnck-3. I don't know why they chose this
> versioning, but it'
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:31:38 +0100
Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have the following in gnome.scm:
> $ guix package -A libwnck
> libwnck 2.30.7 out gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1464:2
> libwnck 3.14.0 out gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1435:2
>
> However, the first one is internall
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:31:38 +0100
Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have the following in gnome.scm:
> $ guix package -A libwnck
> libwnck 2.30.7 out gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1464:2
> libwnck 3.14.0 out gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1435:2
>
> However, the first one is internall
