Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-02-13 Thread Catonano
Just as a note, there was this talk at the Fosdem and I think it adds some bits I had missed (mostly because I don' t know nodejs) http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/fosdem/2017/K.4.601/deploying_npm_packages_with_nix.vp8.webm

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-21 Thread Catonano
2017-01-21 22:41 GMT+01:00 Mike Gerwitz : > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 20:12:25 +0100, Catonano wrote: > > I could use some help, here, by someone used the the Nodejs intricacies > > Scoped packages are described here: > > https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/scope thanks > > > I've never actually used

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-21 Thread Mike Gerwitz
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 20:12:25 +0100, Catonano wrote: > I could use some help, here, by someone used the the Nodejs intricacies Scoped packages are described here: https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/scope I've never actually used them, but they're installed normally: https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/i

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-21 Thread Catonano
The 2 symbols 'the-package-does-not-exist 'the-version-does-not-exist are clearer. Some other package declares these as a dependency. But such dependency doesn't exist Will these dependants be buildable ? I don't know There are many of these cases

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-21 Thread Catonano
2017-01-21 20:12 GMT+01:00 Catonano : I could use some help, here, by someone used the the Nodejs intricacies > > I don't know what they mean with "scoped" and I don't know what this could > mean exactly for the "Nodejs in Guix" mission > The same goes for packages like this scheme@(guile-user)>

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-21 Thread Catonano
2017-01-19 23:51 GMT+01:00 Catonano : > One last note > One more quick note > > I pasted the wrong url for the packages with no dependencies > > The right one is this > http://catonano.altervista.org/no-deps.txt > > I noticed now that this list contains ALSO the broken ones. They have no > depen

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-20 Thread Mike Gerwitz
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 22:14:42 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > (One could argue that single-function packages are “trivial” from a > copyright standpoint. Then the subset of the npm repo containing those > trivial packages could be viewed as a database of “facts” (which, in > some jurisdiction,

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-20 Thread Catonano
2017-01-20 22:23 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Courtès : > Hi! > > Catonano skribis: > > > I made a crawler and I let it loose on the jquery 3.1.1 dependencies on > > registry.npmjs.com > > > > It recursevely fetched the dependencies of jquery 3.1.1, then the > > dependencies of the dependencies, then the de

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Catonano skribis: > I made a crawler and I let it loose on the jquery 3.1.1 dependencies on > registry.npmjs.com > > It recursevely fetched the dependencies of jquery 3.1.1, then the > dependencies of the dependencies, then the dependencies of the dependencies > of the dependencies... and so

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hey, Mike Gerwitz skribis: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 21:48:44 +0100, Catonano wrote: >> Anyway, now I have a COMPLETE graph of the dependencies of jquery 3.1.1 >> >> It's made of >> 47311 vertices and >> 324569 edges > > lol... > >> Anyway, these broken packages pose a challenge to the mission o

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-19 Thread Mike Gerwitz
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 21:48:44 +0100, Catonano wrote: > Anyway, now I have a COMPLETE graph of the dependencies of jquery 3.1.1 > > It's made of > 47311 vertices and > 324569 edges lol... > Anyway, these broken packages pose a challenge to the mission of porting > Jquery into Guix, in my opinio

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-19 Thread Catonano
One last note I pasted the wrong url for the packages with no dependencies The right one is this http://catonano.altervista.org/no-deps.txt I noticed now that this list contains ALSO the broken ones. They have no dependencies, but they shold be excluded from this list Because I screwed up the d

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-19 Thread Catonano
2017-01-19 23:44 GMT+01:00 Catonano : > 2017-01-19 22:07 GMT+01:00 Jelle Licht : > >> Hello Catonano, >> >> >> > > > > >> These pictures are very informative indeed. I will try to be brief, but I >> quickly wanted to share >> that I find your efforts (and results!) amazing. >> > > Thanks :-) > >>

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-19 Thread Catonano
2017-01-19 22:07 GMT+01:00 Jelle Licht : > Hello Catonano, > > > > These pictures are very informative indeed. I will try to be brief, but I > quickly wanted to share > that I find your efforts (and results!) amazing. > Thanks :-) > Something of note: a big chunk of the packages you classif

Re: jquery 3.1.1

2017-01-19 Thread Jelle Licht
Hello Catonano, 2017-01-19 21:48 GMT+01:00 Catonano : > I made a crawler and I let it loose on the jquery 3.1.1 dependencies on > registry.npmjs.com > It recursevely fetched the dependencies of jquery 3.1.1, then the > dependencies of the dependencies, then the dependencies of the dependencies >