On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:01:30PM +0200, Stefan Reichör wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add xonsh.
>
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (xonsh): New variable.
I corrected the license to bsd-2 [0], moved the package definition to
(gnu packages shells) and pushed as 1d51585573f491.
Thanks!
[0]
https://g
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:59:08 -0400
> Leo Famulari wrote:
>
>> Should it block the package? Or perhaps we can push the patch as-is and
>> you can submit a follow-up to add the features you want?
>
> It's fine to use as-is, it just looks like a shell from 1973 :)
>
>
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:59:08 -0400
Leo Famulari wrote:
> Should it block the package? Or perhaps we can push the patch as-is and
> you can submit a follow-up to add the features you want?
It's fine to use as-is, it just looks like a shell from 1973 :)
LGTM.
Also, I've tested Stefan's package a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:18:28PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for this package! With the recent
> how-did-anyone-think-that-was-a-good-idea in bash (again), this is very
> useful.
>
> However, are you sure you want to have no inputs for xonsh?
>
> I can see that it supp
Hi,
thanks for this package! With the recent
how-did-anyone-think-that-was-a-good-idea in bash (again), this is very useful.
However, are you sure you want to have no inputs for xonsh?
I can see that it supports at least these:
- python-ply
- python-sphinx
- python-numpydoc
- python-prompt-tool
