Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Am 16.11.23 um 15:22 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: We could distinguish security issues in packages provided by Guix from security issues in Guix itself. Maybe its also a good idea to add a security.txt to the website? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security.txt "is meant to allow security research

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Hello! Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > Great, I was waiting for someone to reply so's to glom on and ask to be > included in the same commit to minimise noise. Could you take care of updating the security web page? Ludo’.

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Hi, On mer., 22 nov. 2023 at 19:16, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo, Tobias, and John: What would be a good end-of-term date for each > one of you? As I see it, it wouldn’t mean you cannot do an additional > term but rather that you’ll have an opportunity to leave and that you’ll > do your best to

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Hi Ludo’ and everyone else, On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:16 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello, > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:31:41PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > [...] > >>> > If maintainers agree (Cc’d), I invite you to add your name and a >>> > termination da

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Great, I was waiting for someone to reply so's to glom on and ask to be included in the same commit to minimise noise. So, there. Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:16:21PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo, Tobias, and John: What would be a good end-of-term date for each > one of you? As I see it, it wouldn’t mean you cannot do an additional > term but rather that you’ll have an opportunity to leave and that you’ll > do your best

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Hello, Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:31:41PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: [...] >> > If maintainers agree (Cc’d), I invite you to add your name and a >> > termination date to the security page, remove my name, and subscribe to >> > guix-security. We should add a term

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:31:41PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi, > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > [...] > > > Yes, we definitely need a rotation here! I for one have my name there > > but regardless of my interest, I have to admit that I’ve been unable to > > be sufficiently responsive.

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] > Yes, we definitely need a rotation here! I for one have my name there > but regardless of my interest, I have to admit that I’ve been unable to > be sufficiently responsive. It’s time to let new folks take > responsibility. > > I think we should make this a

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Hello, Am Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 03:22:42PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Yes, we definitely need a rotation here! I for one have my name there > but regardless of my interest, I have to admit that I’ve been unable to > be sufficiently responsive. It’s time to let new folks take > responsibilit

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Hi John, Looks like this message was left unanswered for more than a month, which proves you have a point! John Kehayias skribis: > - current security email/people can be found here, which is nicely > visible yet probably in need of a > hand and new faces for