Hi Ludo,
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 22:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> In the case of ice-wm, it would seem that there’s the extra difficulty
> that source is scattered in different places (where are the .po files?),
> so perhaps that’s a case where you may want to use the tarball, possibly
> discussin
Hello!
Simon Tournier skribis:
> What is the usual way to deal with these generated files? Can we
> distribute them although it is not the Guix project that generates them
> from source?
In pure bootstrappable spirit, we should view tarballs as byproducts,
not source, and thus depend only on t
Hi, I wonder how is this different from the common practice of
projects using GNU autotools, which the project in question is also
one, that the Makefile.in was generated from Makefile.am, but the
tarball may contain the "generated" Makefile.in and configure and Guix
won't bother to re-generate the
