Hi!
zimoun skribis:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 11:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Despite being a first experience, the live event went very smoothly (for
>> me at least, with ungoogled-chromium), it was great to see faces during
>> the break :-), and the discussions were all exciting for me. I
Hi Ludo,
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 11:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Despite being a first experience, the live event went very smoothly (for
> me at least, with ungoogled-chromium), it was great to see faces during
> the break :-), and the discussions were all exciting for me. I agree
> it’d be gre
Hi!
I too really enjoyed the day and the talks! Speakers did wonders like
you wrote, but I think you, Simon, and Leo also did an amazing job
getting that event up and running, thumbs up! Many thanks to Fosshost
and to those who helped make that happen behind the scenes.
Despite being a first ex
Hi,
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:13:38PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote:
>> I'm happy it was an online event and I could participate. I live in
>> India and travelling to Europe is a bank-breaking endeavour that is
>> normally out of the question. I think even future offline Guix
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:13:38PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote:
> Guix Day was wonderful. Thank you very much for organizing it! More than
> anything, I attended just to see people's faces, and put faces to
> names. Seeing smiling faces is surprisingly motivating, especially in
> lockdown times
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:42:02PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> Since people reported everyone turning their cameras on significantly
> degrading performance, that is unlikely to be an accurate analogy.
> My guess is that it's more similar to watching N simultaneous streams,
> where N is the number of
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:32:07PM +0100, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote:
> In video conferencing clients need to do video encoding (when they use
> their webcam) as well as video decoding in real time. This can be pretty
> resource hungry (CPU) especially when there is no proper HW acceleration
> by th
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 23:17:57 -0500
Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:31:53PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> > Oh yea, regarding that, I really think it would have made a whole
> > lot more sense if people just sent in a photo, instead of DDoS-ing
> > the network.
>
> I don't know how
On 25.11.20 19:24, Leo Famulari wrote> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at
06:50:41PM +0100, Michael Rohleder wrote>> Browser is icecat
78.5.0-guix0-preview1 with all extensions disabled,>> except
"Surfingkeys". Computer is something like this (neofetch):> > [...]>
> Hm... it seems unlikely that this comp
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:17 +0100
zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 23:28, raingloom wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:26:37PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> >> > My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4
> >> > minutes, sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:31:53PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> Oh yea, regarding that, I really think it would have made a whole lot
> more sense if people just sent in a photo, instead of DDoS-ing the
> network.
I don't know how BBB works nor did I measure it, but one can expect a
videochat feed to
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:47:46 +0100
Michael Rohleder wrote:
> raingloom writes:
> > My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes,
> > sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently
> > it's still pretty heavy.
>
> I had a similar issue, but only in the
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 13:24, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:50:41PM +0100, Michael Rohleder wrote:
>> Browser is icecat 78.5.0-guix0-preview1 with all extensions disabled,
>> except "Surfingkeys".
>>
>> Computer is something like this (neofetch):
>
> [...]
>
> Hm... it see
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 23:28, raingloom wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:26:37PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
>> > My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes,
>> > sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently
>> > it's still pretty heavy.
What do
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 22:53:21 -0500
Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:26:37PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> > My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes,
> > sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently
> > it's still pretty heavy.
>
> Can
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:50:41PM +0100, Michael Rohleder wrote:
> Browser is icecat 78.5.0-guix0-preview1 with all extensions disabled,
> except "Surfingkeys".
>
> Computer is something like this (neofetch):
[...]
Hm... it seems unlikely that this computer, which is relatively
powerful, couldn
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 02:19:17PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Since this historical place would not change* “soon”, first because we
> like it (I speak for myself) and second because it is accommodating,
> ideas to deal with poor network are welcome. :-)
The standard solution is to do cellular network
Hi Simon,
zimoun writes:
> As Leo asked: Can you say what web browser you were using? Bonus points
> if you can give us the exact version, assuming it's from Guix. And what
> kind of computer did you use?
Browser is icecat 78.5.0-guix0-preview1 with all extensions disabled,
except "Surfingkeys".
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 11:47, Michael Rohleder wrote:
> I had a similar issue, but only in the break where we had lots of
> webcams: After about 5 or 6 webcams, my (slow) net connection became
> satturated and BBB seems to loose more and more
> informations/connections/gets out of sy
Hi Arun,
Thank you for your kind words.
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 21:13, Arun Isaac wrote:
> I'm happy it was an online event and I could participate. I live in
> India and travelling to Europe is a bank-breaking endeavour that is
> normally out of the question. I think even future offline Guix D
Leo Famulari writes:
> Yes, absolutely! I do this sort of thing — hybrid events — for my day
> job, and I could help make it happen in the future.
Thank you, that is much appreciated!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
raingloom writes:
> My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes,
> sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently it's
> still pretty heavy.
I had a similar issue, but only in the break where we had lots of
webcams: After about 5 or 6 webcams, my (slow) n
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:26:37PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes,
> sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently it's
> still pretty heavy.
Can you say what web browser you were using? Bonus points if you can
give
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 03:00:56 +0100
Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Hi Guixers!
>
> Thank you for your participation to the Guix Days on this November
> 22nd. We were around 60 people at all time, for a total of over 80
> people during the day. We hope to see you again soon on IRC or the
> mailing list
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:13:38PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote:
> I'm happy it was an online event and I could participate. I live in
> India and travelling to Europe is a bank-breaking endeavour that is
> normally out of the question. I think even future offline Guix Days,
> after the pandemic, should
Hi,
Guix Day was wonderful. Thank you very much for organizing it! More than
anything, I attended just to see people's faces, and put faces to
names. Seeing smiling faces is surprisingly motivating, especially in
lockdown times. :-)
I'm happy it was an online event and I could participate. I liv
26 matches
Mail list logo
