Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!

2022-05-31 Thread Christopher Baines
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hopefully we’ll get a clearer picture in the coming days… There is starting to be some information in the QA data service instance: https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/compare-by-datetime/package-derivations?base_branch=master&base_datetime=&target_branch=staging&target_d

Re: python-cryptography and rust [was: Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!]

2022-05-23 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 11:22:05PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: [...] >> Yes, so what do you mean? Should we keep the old 3.3.1 for use on >> non-x86_64 platforms? Would that even work? > > I'll add 3.4.8 for non-x86_64 platforms and see if I can do somethi

Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!

2022-05-23 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, zimoun skribis: > On Sun, 15 May 2022 at 22:55, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> I propose freezing tomorrow evening, Monday 16th ca. 8PM CEST. >> How does that sound? > > LGTM. The branch is now frozen and receive only fixes, right? An update: ci.guix wasn’t building much lately due to a bug

Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!

2022-05-16 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Sun, 15 May 2022 at 22:55, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I propose freezing tomorrow evening, Monday 16th ca. 8PM CEST. > How does that sound? LGTM. The branch is now frozen and receive only fixes, right? Note the «Aborted» status on . Cheers, simon

Re: python-cryptography and rust [was: Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!]

2022-05-16 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 11:22:05PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Efraim, > > (+Cc: Marius.) > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > > > python-cryptography now depends on rust. We're going to need 3.4.8 from > > the 3.4 series for the other architectures. Currently > > python-cryptography@36.0.1 is

Re: python-cryptography and rust [was: Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!]

2022-05-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Efraim, (+Cc: Marius.) Efraim Flashner skribis: > python-cryptography now depends on rust. We're going to need 3.4.8 from > the 3.4 series for the other architectures. Currently > python-cryptography@36.0.1 is gating about 3000 packages. Yes, so what do you mean? Should we keep the old 3.3

Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!

2022-05-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Guix! Ludovic Courtès skribis: > zimoun skribis: > >> The schedule could be: >> >> + freeze the ’staging’ branch on the Sun May, 8th >> + fix until it is ready, targeting the Sun, May 22th >> + prepare a release for June > > So now I look ridiculous for being derailed myself… But yes, so

python-cryptography and rust [was: Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!]

2022-05-10 Thread Efraim Flashner
python-cryptography now depends on rust. We're going to need 3.4.8 from the 3.4 series for the other architectures. Currently python-cryptography@36.0.1 is gating about 3000 packages. -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality

Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!

2022-05-08 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Sun, 08 May 2022 at 00:04, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > zimoun skribis: > >> The schedule could be: >> >> + freeze the ’staging’ branch on the Sun May, 8th >> + fix until it is ready, targeting the Sun, May 22th >> + prepare a release for June > > So now I look ridiculous for being deraile

Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!

2022-05-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! zimoun skribis: > The schedule could be: > > + freeze the ’staging’ branch on the Sun May, 8th > + fix until it is ready, targeting the Sun, May 22th > + prepare a release for June So now I look ridiculous for being derailed myself… But yes, something like this offset by one (or two?) w

Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!

2022-05-03 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi! > > The ‘staging’ branch is open! Which means that changes with “between > 300 and 1,800 rebuilds” (info "(guix) Submitting Patches") can go there; > now’s the time to (re)send package updates in that ballpark. Just to be clear, it was never closed :-). > Inc

Re: ‘staging’ branch is open!

2022-04-30 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 01:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Incidentally, I was considering ungrafting things on that branch, even > those that go beyond the 1,800 dependents limit, since this is almost > always a safe change and ci.guix now has the capacity and stability > needed for that. Cool

Re: Staging branch is OPEN

2019-12-12 Thread Alex Griffin
Never mind, I see that it was already updated. -- Alex Griffin On Thu, Dec 12, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Alex Griffin wrote: > Is eudev 3.2.9 an appropriate update for staging? It contains an > important fix for Librem laptop keyboards. > > $ guix refresh -l eudev > Building the following 964

Re: Staging branch is OPEN

2019-12-12 Thread Alex Griffin
Is eudev 3.2.9 an appropriate update for staging? It contains an important fix for Librem laptop keyboards. $ guix refresh -l eudev Building the following 964 packages would ensure 1723 dependent packages are rebuilt: ... -- Alex Griffin On Wed, Dec 11, 2019, at 10:34 PM, Marius Bakke

Re: 'staging' branch is OPEN

2019-10-10 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 09:29:05PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Guix, > > Now that 'core-updates' is merged (\o/), it's time to restart the > regular 'staging' cycles. > > Please push your patches before Monday, October 14th. After that the > branch will be 'frozen' and hopefully merged some day

Re: 'staging' branch is OPEN

2019-10-08 Thread Björn Höfling
On Tue, 08 Oct 2019 21:29:05 +0200 Marius Bakke wrote: > Guix, > > Now that 'core-updates' is merged (\o/), it's time to restart the > regular 'staging' cycles. > > Please push your patches before Monday, October 14th. After that the > branch will be 'frozen' and hopefully merged some days lat